Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
11 02 101 • KG LU 11 02 101 Généré par l'IA

Wage Underpayment Penalty Reduction in Collective Bargaining Dispute

Numéro de cause 11 02 101
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Suisse · Canton de Lucerne (CH-LU)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Rejeté (Dismissed)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

In a dispute concerning the construction industry's collective bargaining agreement (LMV), an administrative review board imposed a contractual penalty on an employer for failing to pay the correct base wages to three employees, amounting to an underpayment of CHF 23,577.05, though the employer promptly corrected the arrears and argued the failure was unintentional. The lower court reduced the initially imposed penalty, and upon appeal, the higher court upheld the reduction, reasoning that the board's standard practice of setting the penalty at one-third of the withheld payments was insufficient as it failed to adequately weigh all specified mitigating and aggravating factors on a case-by-case basis, such as the employer's prompt rectification, the minor nature of the remaining issues, and the fact that it was a small family business, justifying the lower penalty amount to still serve the penalty's preventive purpose.

Regeste Legislator

Officiel

Art. 356 OR; Art. 79 Abs. 3 LMV. Landesmantelvertrag für das Bauhauptgewerbe. Bemessung der Konventionalstrafe bei Verletzung gesamtarbeitsvertraglicher Bestimmungen. Eine ständige Praxis, die Konventionalstrafe in Höhe eines Drittels der vorenthaltenen geldwerten Leistungen festzusetzen, wird dem Einzelfall nicht gerecht. | OR (Obligationenrecht)

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
négociation collective circonstances atténuantes clause pénale contrat d'affacturage salaire minimum retenue sur le salaire

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
Art. 356 OR
This provision is cited in the decision summary and appears in the body text, indicating it is part of the legal framework for the dispute, although the dispositive orders themselves are missing specific article citations beyond the general mention.
Art. 79 Abs. 3 LMV
This provision, governing the criteria for setting the contractual penalty, is explicitly cited in the leading part of the decision, justifying the court's reasoning on the penalty calculation.
Art. 79 Abs. 2 lit. b LMV
Art. 79 Abs. 3 lit. a-f LMV

Jurisprudence citée

Généré par l'IA
Généré par l'IA

Questions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator

Généré par l'IA
Art. 356 OR

This provision is cited in the decision summary and appears in the body text, indicating it is part of the legal framework for the dispute, although the dispositive orders themselves are missing specific article citations beyond the general mention.

Art. 79 Abs. 3 LMV

This provision, governing the criteria for setting the contractual penalty, is explicitly cited in the leading part of the decision, justifying the court's reasoning on the penalty calculation.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

Rechtsprechung Luzern

Instanz: · Obergericht

Abteilung: · I. Kammer

Rechtsgebiet: · OR (Obligationenrecht)

Entscheiddatum: · 02.12.2003

Fallnummer: · 11 02 101

LGVE: · 2004 I Nr. 25

Leitsatz: · Art. 356 OR; Art. 79 Abs. 3 LMV. Landesmantelvertrag für das Bauhauptgewerbe. Bemessung der Konventionalstrafe bei Verletzung gesamtarbeitsvertraglicher Bestimmungen. Eine ständige Praxis, die Konventionalstrafe in Höhe eines Drittels der vorenthaltenen geldwerten Leistungen festzusetzen, wird dem Einzelfall nicht gerecht.

Rechtskraft: · Diese Entscheidung ist rechtskräftig.