Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
DE FR IT EN
Analyser dans Legislator
A/4667/2005 • TAPI GE A/4667/2005 Généré par l'IA

Appeal Regarding Timeliness of Opposition and Admissibility of Evidence

Numéro de cause A/4667/2005
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Suisse · Canton de Genève (CH-GE)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Rejeté (Dismissed)
Ouvrir la source officielle Miroir Entscheidsuche Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The appellant contested a decision, arguing that the opposition filed by the opposing party was time-barred under Article 23, paragraph 2 of the relevant procedural law, and that the trial court erred by not admitting evidence to prove the late filing, despite this constituting a direct means of proof regarding the timeliness of the action. The court rejected the appeal, implicitly finding that the opposition was timely or that the procedural requirements concerning the admissibility of evidence related to time limits were correctly applied by the lower court, thereby affirming the original decision.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Appeal Regarding Timeliness of Opposition and Admissibility of Evidence: The court rejected the appeal, implicitly finding that the opposition was timely or that the procedural requirements concerning the admissibility of evidence related to time limits were correctly applied by the lower court, thereby affirming the original decision.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
respect du délai de recours exceptions procédurales tardives recours contre décision de renvoi moment de la transmission des preuves nouveau moyen de droit droit d'obtenir une décision
Généré par l'IA
A/1755/2007
Appellant v. Opponent on Timeliness and Standing of Opposition
C/4030/2013
Appellant v. Respondent on Timeliness of Claim and Evidentiary Rulings
C/20181/2019
Appeal Regarding Timeliness of Seizure Opposition
P/16143/2024
Appeal Regarding Timeliness of Opposition to Penal Order Service
P/5370/2024
Appeal Regarding Admissibility of Timely Opposition Despite Postal Error

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

A/4667/2005

### [DCRI/27/2008](/apps/decis/fr/dccr/show/1602232) du 28.01.2008 ( ICC ) , REJETE

Descripteurs :

; DÉLAI ; OPPOSITION(PROCÉDURE) ; MOYEN DE DROIT ; ADMINISTRATION DES PREUVES

Normes :

LISP. 23. al2

[![Pdf]()](/apps/decis/fr/dccr/file/2008/0000/DCRI_000027_2008_A_4667_2005.pdf)

* /