175.2
VRGLPALGA
CH-ZH
CH-ZH
Art. 21: Administrative Justice Act (AJL)
Art. 21
50 1 Any person affected by the order and having a legitimate interest in its
annulment or amendment is entitled to file an appeal.
2 Municipalities and other public bodies with legal personality are entitled
to appeal if they
a. are affected by the order like a private person and have a
legitimate interest in its annulment or amendment,
b. assert a violation of guarantees granted to them by the cantonal
or federal constitution,
c. are otherwise injured in their legitimate interests while fulfilling
statutory duties, particularly in the event of a significant encroachment
on their financial or administrative assets.
a. In general
1.7.24 - 125
9
175.2 Administrative Justice Act (VRG)
b. In matters of
voting rights
c. When
contesting
legal norms
Filing an appeal
a. Place and
deadline
b. Content of
the appeal
c. Suspension
Right to appeal
Court Decisions Applying This Provision (905)
VB.2012.00243 · zh (§ 21 Abs. I VRG)
Tender Exclusion Appeal Regarding Sewage Sludge Plant Suitability References
This provision is cited in the decision's concluding orders, concerning the procedural status or outcome.
VB.2009.00321 · zh (§ 21 lit. a VRG)
Property Owner Billboard Permit Appeal Dismissed for Lack of Standing and Substantive Validity
The court ruled that the lower instance should not have entertained the appeal because the appellant lacked the necessary current legal interest (Rechtsschutzinteresse).
VB.2008.00123 · zh (§ 21 Abs. I VRG)
Municipal Assembly Resolution Challenge Regarding Building Boundaries and Right to Be Heard
This provision was cited in the list of legal norms, likely relating to the procedural decision on the admissibility of the appeal.
VB.2008.00066 · zh (Art. 21 lit. a VRG)
Bell Noise Remediation Jurisdiction: Local Building Authority vs. District Council
Cited in the context of the procedural ruling concerning the appeal against refusal to act (Rechtsverweigerung).
VB.2007.00517 · zh (§ 21 lit. a VRG)
Professional License Revocation Overturned Due to Procedural Due Process Violations and Insufficient Evidence
Cited in relation to the principle of proportionality.
VB.2007.00361 · zh (§ 21 lit. a VRG)
Failure to Pass Licentiate Exams and Academic Dismissal Upheld
Cited in the relevant legal norms section, suggesting application in the final procedural or substantive ruling.
VB.2007.00335 · zh (§ 21 lit. a VRG)
Appeal Against Canton-Wide Open Fire Ban and Fireworks Permit Revocation
Cited in relation to the question of the appellant's interest in challenging the decision despite the lack of current legal interest.
VB.2007.00177 · zh (§ 21 lit. a VRG)
Property Owner Lacks Standing to Challenge Speed Limit Zone
This provision was cited alongside Art. 3 Abs. IV SVG, suggesting its relevance to the overall context of the decision concerning administrative review, even if the final disposal was based on lack of legitimacy.
VB.2006.00245 · zh (§ 21 lit. b VRG)
Municipality Standing and Proportionality in Building Line Establishment for Pathway
This provision is listed among the relevant norms, suggesting its application in the procedural outcome.
VB.2006.00348 · zh (§ 21 lit. b VRG)
Landowner Approval of Lakefront Garden Shed Overruling Aesthetic Building Line Restrictions
This procedural rule was cited in relation to the outcome, likely concerning the decision-making power or procedure of the administrative court.
VB.2006.00329 · zh (§ 21 lit. a VRG)
Supervisory Authority Approval of Foundation Charter Amendment Challenged Over Standing and Scope of Review
Cited as the relevant provision defining a challengeable object for the appeal.
VB.2006.00096 · zh (§ 21 lit. a VRG)
Resident Appeal Against Road Project Approval Dismissed Due to Lack of Standing
The court implicitly relies on this provision when discussing the procedural aspects of the appeal to the administrative court.
VB.2005.00353 · zh (§ 21 lit. a VRG)
Transport Companies v. Municipality on Road Traffic Restriction for Maintenance Deferral
This procedural provision was likely cited in the reasoning concerning the legitimacy of the appellants to appeal (E. 2), but it is not explicitly mentioned in the final orders as a basis for the decision itself (annulment/costs).
PB.2004.00085 · zh (§ 21 lit. a VRG)
Workplace Discrimination and Mobbing Suit: Compensation Increased for Emotional Distress
Cited in relation to the inadmissibility of new claims in appeal proceedings.
VB.2005.00506 · zh (§ 21 lit. a VRG)
Administrative Court Dismisses Appeal on Boundary Mutations Due to Lack of Protected Interest
This procedural provision is listed in the 'Rechtsnormen' section associated with the decision, indicating its relevance to the process.