836.1
AGFAMZGLALAFAM
CH-VS
CH-VS
Art. 8 Act implementing the Federal Act on Family Allowances (LALAFam) - Training Allowance
General Provisions - Family Allowances
Art. 8 AGFamZG - Training Allowance · Training Allowance
1. The education allowance is a monthly benefit that is granted from the end of the month in which the child turns 16 years old until the completion of training, but no longer than until the end of the month in which the child turns 25 years old.
2. The education allowance is also payable if the training begins before the child turns 16 years old.
3. The education allowance amounts to 445 Swiss Francs per month.
Court Decisions Applying This Provision (33)
A/4053/2018 · ge (Art. 8 al. 4 LAF)
Family Allowance Recipient Qualification for Family Supplement Regardless of Primary Residence
This article is cited as the basis for the supplements granted to the appellant.
A/4053/2018 · ge (Art. 8 al. 4 let. a LAF)
Family Allowance Recipient Qualification for Family Supplement Regardless of Primary Residence
This article is cited to grant the supplement to the birth allowance.
A/4025/2018 · ge (art. 8 al. 1 LAF)
Appeal Regarding Birth Allowance Eligibility Based on Residency Period
Cited in the reasoning section (para 3b) to state the amount of the birth allowance.
C/4614/2017 · ge (art. 8 al. 2 LAF)
Provisional Maintenance Adjustment After Marital Separation: Income Assessment and Standard of Living Review
Cited in the reasoning regarding the amount of federal family allowances.
C/4614/2017 · ge (art. 8 al. 4 LAF)
Provisional Maintenance Adjustment After Marital Separation: Income Assessment and Standard of Living Review
Cited in the reasoning regarding the increase in family allowances for the third child.
C/20944/2012 · ge (Art. 8 al. 2 LAF)
Appeal Regarding Retroactive Custody Modification and Spousal Support Reduction in Divorce Decree
Cited to state the amount of the allowance per child between 16 and 20 years old.
A/4515/2016 · ge (Art. 8 al. 3 LAF)
Father's Appeal Regarding Daughter's Professional Training Allowances During Aptitude Test Preparation
Cited in the reasoning (not the dispositive) regarding the amount of the professional training allowance in Geneva.
A/4515/2016 · ge (Art. 8 al. 4 let. b) LAF)
Father's Appeal Regarding Daughter's Professional Training Allowances During Aptitude Test Preparation
Cited in the reasoning (not the dispositive) regarding the increase in family allowances for the third child and subsequent children in Geneva.
A/2460/2016 · ge (Art. 8 al. 3 LAF)
Training Allowance Denial Appeal Based on Domicile
Cited to establish the amount of the professional training allowance.
A/2460/2016 · ge (Art. 8 al. 4 let. b LAF)
Training Allowance Denial Appeal Based on Domicile
Cited to establish the increase in the allowance amount for the third and subsequent entitled children.
C/26343/2013 · ge (art. 8 al. 2 let. b LAF)
Spousal Appeal Regarding Child Custody, Support, and Cost Allocation
Although cited in the reasoning section (Art. 5.3.3 and 5.3.4), it is not explicitly used in the dispositive orders regarding the substance of the appeal decision.
A/1775/2014 · ge (art. 8 al. 2 let. a et al. 4 let. b de la loi genevoise sur les allocations familiales du 1er mars 1996 (LAF – J 510))
Appeal on Supplementary Benefits Calculation and Imputed Income
Cited to support the finding that the amount of family allowances claimed by the appellant corresponds to the relevant legal provisions.
AF.2010.0002 · vd (art. 8 LAF)
Appeal on Reimbursement of Land Improvement Subsidies After Conversion of Agricultural Barn
Cited in the legal analysis regarding the State's ability to subsidize land improvements.
A/3069/2010 · ge (art. 8 al. 4 LAF)
Mother's Right to Large Family Supplement Overriding Statutory Priority Order
Cited in order 4, indicating the specific provision for the increased family allowance supplements the respondent must pay.
A/1329/2008 · ge (art. 8 al. 2 let. b LAF)
Father's Right to Family Allowances for Children Abroad
Cited in the reasoning as the basis for the required monthly contribution, although the decision ultimately deviated from this strict requirement based on the appellant's income.