312.0
EGSTPOLACPP
CH-VS
CH-VS
Art. 14 Act on the Application of the Swiss Criminal Procedure Code (LACPP) - Appeals Instance
1. Criminal Authorities - Courts and Other Authorities
Art. 14 EGStPO - Appeals Instance · Appeals Instance
1. The cantonal court serves as the appeal instance.
2. A cantonal judge can decide on appeals against judgments of district judges that involve a fine, a monetary penalty, community service, or a suspended prison sentence as the principal punishment, provided that a previously suspended sentence is not revoked. The appointed judge may bring the case before a court panel.
3. In other cases, the appeal is subject to a court panel of the cantonal court.
Court Decisions Applying This Provision (15)
P3 25 162 · vs (Art. 14 Abs. 1 StPO)
Cantonal Court Upholds Penalty Order Based on Statutory Fiction of Delivery
Cited in the reasoning concerning the decision-making body for appeals against decisions on objection validity.
P3 24 194 · vs (Art. 14 Abs. 1 StPO i.V.m. Art. 13 Abs. 1 EGStPO)
Appeal Dismissed: Denial of Conditional Release for Convicted Sex Offender
Cited in the reasoning regarding the status of the reviewing judge, but not explicitly in the final orders.
P3 24 163 · vs (Art. 14 Abs. 2 StPO)
Prosecutor v. District Court on Jurisdiction for Defamation and Coercion Case
Applied to waive the collection of court fees exceptionally.
P3 23 305 · vs (Art. 14 Abs. 1 StPO)
Appellant v. Prosecutor (Slander Discontinuation)
Cited in the reasoning regarding the jurisdiction of the Cantonal Court judge.
P3 22 174 · vs (Art. 14 Abs. 1 StPO i.V.m. Art. 13 Abs. 1 EGStPO)
Dismissal of Defamation Complaint Due to Procedural and Substantive Insufficiency
Cited in the reasoning to establish jurisdiction for appealing the non-committal order.
P3 22 69 · vs (Art. 14 Abs. 1 StPO)
Prosecutor's Suspension of Criminal Proceedings Overruled Due to Unreasonable Delay
Cited as a procedural basis concerning the court competence to review the appeal against the suspension order.
P3 21 258 · vs (Art. 14 Abs. 1 StPO i.V.m. Art. 13 Abs. 1 EGStPO)
Refusal of Conditional Release Upheld Due to Reoffending Risk and Non-Cooperation with Deportation
Cited to establish that the appeal body is a judge of the Cantonal Court.
P3 21 245 · vs (Art. 14 Abs. 1 StPO)
Defamation Jurisdiction Challenge Dismissed on Venue Grounds
Cited in the reasoning regarding the appeal instance, but not in the final orders.
P1 14 46 · vs (Art. 14 Abs. 1 EGStPO)
Claimant Appeal Regarding Coercion/Defamation Conviction and Cost Allocation Dismissed
Mentioned in the reasoning for establishing jurisdiction, but not cited in the dispositive.
P1 14 46 · vs (Art. 14 Abs. 2 Satz 1 EGStPO)
Claimant Appeal Regarding Coercion/Defamation Conviction and Cost Allocation Dismissed
Mentioned in the reasoning for establishing jurisdiction, but not cited in the dispositive.
P1 14 46 · vs (Art. 14 Abs. 2 Satz 2 und Abs. 3 EGStPO)
Claimant Appeal Regarding Coercion/Defamation Conviction and Cost Allocation Dismissed
Mentioned in the reasoning for establishing jurisdiction, but not cited in the dispositive.
P1 13 9 · vs (art. 14 al. 1 et 2 LACPP)
Appeal on Breach of Trust Conviction and Custody Dispute Over Dog
Cited in the reasoning to establish the court's jurisdiction to hear the appeal.
P3 12 190 · vs (Art. 14 Abs. 1 StPO i.V.m. Art. 13 Abs. 1 des Einführungsgesetzes zur Schweizerischen Strafprozessordnung vom 11. Februar 2009 [EGStPO; SGS/VS 312.0])
Appeal Against Dismissal of Criminal Proceedings for Fork Fracture on Rented Scooter
Cited regarding the jurisdiction of a single judge of the Cantonal Court to hear the appeal.
A3 11 13 · vs (Art. 14 Ziff. 2 und 194bis der Strafprozessordnung vom 22. Februar 1962 (StPO/VS))
Municipality Fines Developer for Permit Violation; Procedural Flaw Leads to Case Transfer and Compensation
These articles establish the authority of the single judge to rule on the appeal.
A3 09 22 · vs (Art. 14 Ziff. 2 StPO)
Building Fine Appeal: Procedural Violation Cured by Subsequent Hearing
Cited as the basis for the appealability of the administrative penalty decision to the cantonal court judge.