312.0 EGSTPOLACPP

CH-VS

Art. 11 Act on the Application of the Swiss Criminal Procedure Code (LACPP) - Competent Authorities in the Area of Infractions

1. Criminal Authorities - Courts and Other Authorities

Open official source Full Act (50 Articles) Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Art. 11 EGStPO - Competent Authorities in the Area of Infractions · Competent Authorities in the Area of Infractions

1. The district judge adjudicates on federal and cantonal offenses, subject to the delegated jurisdiction to

a) the public prosecutor's office;

b) the administrative authority designated by special legislation.

2. In the absence of contrary provisions, the police court adjudicates on municipal offenses; the law on administrative procedure and administrative justice is applicable (Art. 38 para. 2).

3. A single judge of the cantonal court adjudicates on complaints, appeals, and requests for revision regarding judgments rendered for offenses. The provisions of the Swiss Code of Criminal Procedure, which govern these legal remedies, are applicable unless otherwise provided.

← Art. 10 EGStPO - Compulsory Measures Court Act on the Application of the Swiss Criminal Procedure Code (LACPP) - Federal Criminal Offenses Art. 12 EGStPO - Court of First Instance →

Court Decisions Applying This Provision (7)

P1 24 3 · vs (Art. 11 Abs. 1 StPO)

Cantonal Narcotics, Fraud, Arson, and Theft Appeal Ruling

The criminal proceedings against Z. concerning violations of AHVG, UVG, and BVG were discontinued due to the prohibition of double jeopardy (Order 13c).

A3 24 22 · vs (art. 11 al. 3 de la loi d’application du CPP)

Appeal Against Joint Fine for Illegal Dumping

Cited in the reasoning section (Considérant 5) regarding the scope of appeal regarding costs of remediation.

A3 22 38 · vs (Art. 11 Abs. 2 EGStPO)

Appealability of Acquittal and Costs Reimbursement in Obstruction Case

Cited in the reasoning regarding the applicability of VVRG for cantonal offenses.

A3 22 26 · vs (Art. 11 Abs. 3 EGStPO)

Cantonal Archaeology Notification Violation Fine Reduction

Cited in relation to the analog application of the StPO to cantonal contraventions where no specific provision exists.

A3 21 31 · vs (Art. 11 Abs. 2 und Art. 38 Abs. 3 lit. b EGStPO)

Municipal Fine Appeal Overturned Due to Insufficient Evidence

Cited regarding the competence of the police court, but not cited in the dispositive.

A3 20 20 · vs (article 11 al. 3 de la loi d’application du 11 février 2009 (LACPP ; RS/VS 312.0))

Appellant Acquitted in Noise Disturbance Case Due to Insufficient Evidence of Intent

Cited in the opening sentence, establishing the jurisdictional basis for the decision.

ZWR 2011 S 348 349 · vs (Art. 11 Abs. 3 EGStPO)

Jurisdiction over Traffic Fine Objections

This provision is cited regarding the competence of a single judge of the Cantonal Court to handle appeals against the decision of the District Judge.