Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
173.8 GTARLTAR CH-VS

Art. 23 Act fixing the tariff of fees and costs before judicial or administrative authorities (LTar) - Procedure before Administrative Authorities

Costs - Fees - In Public Law and Social Security Law
Open official source Full Act (47 Articles) Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Art. 23 GTar - Procedure before Administrative Authorities · Procedure before Administrative Authorities

1. In non-monetary cases, administrative authorities shall charge the following fees

a) ***** Municipalities, districts, organs of cantonal administration, corporations, and public law institutions from 90 to 1,000 Francs;

b) ***** Departments from 90 to 1,650 Francs;

c) ***** State Council, Cantonal Supervisory Authority for Lawyers, and Expropriation Valuation Commission from 90 to 1,800 Francs.

2. In monetary cases, the fee may reach three times these amounts.

← Art. 22 GTar - Other Procedures Act fixing the tariff of fees and costs before judicial or administrative authorities (LTar) - Scope of Application Art. 24 GTar - Procedure by Filing a Claim →

Need to analyze how this provision applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this statute against case law, commentaries, and related legislative provisions inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Court Decisions Applying This Provision (5)

A1 24 96 · vs (Art. 23 Abs. 1 lit. c GTar)
Property Owners' Association Appeal Regarding Road Resurfacing as Material Expropriation
Cited in the reasoning section regarding the calculation of the fee before the Assessment Commission, which contextualizes the cost assessment.
A1 24 96 · vs (Art. 23 Abs. 2 GTar)
Property Owners' Association Appeal Regarding Road Resurfacing as Material Expropriation
Cited in the reasoning section regarding the potential fee maximum before the Assessment Commission, which contextualizes the cost assessment.
A1 16 51 · vs (Art. 23 al. 1 let. c LTar)
Supervisory Complaint Admissibility and Administrative Fee Imposition in Refusal to Initiate Construction Police Proceedings
This provision, cited alongside Art. 88 al. 1 LPJA, supports the interpretation allowing fee collection in supervisory matters where complaints lead to non-entry into the merits.
ZZ 12 27 · vs (art. 23 al. 1 let. c LTar)
Attorney Disclosure for Fee Collection Upheld
This rule was cited for the determination of the amount of the procedural costs imposed on the applicant.
P1 11 58 · vs (Art. 23 lit. f GTar)
Forgery of Official Documents in Road Construction Budget Manipulation
Used to set the specific range for the court fee in the appeal proceedings.