Legislator Case Law & Legislation
173.8 GTARLTAR CH-VS

Art. 22 Act fixing the tariff of fees and costs before judicial or administrative authorities (LTar) - Other Procedures

Costs - Fees - In Criminal Law
Open official source Full Act (47 Articles) Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Art. 22 GTar - Other Procedures · Other Procedures

1. Fees for other criminal proceedings will be charged as follows

a) * 40 to 1,200 Swiss Francs for the conciliation procedure before the public prosecutor;

b) * 90 to 6,000 Swiss Francs for other procedures before the public prosecutor;

c) * 90 to 2,400 Swiss Francs for the procedure before the district court;

d) * 190 to 6,000 Swiss Francs for the procedure before the circuit court;

e) * 90 to 1,200 Swiss Francs for the procedure before the compulsory measures court;

f) * 380 to 6,000 Swiss Francs for the appeal or revision procedure before the cantonal court;

g) * 90 to 2,400 Swiss Francs for the complaint procedure before the criminal chamber of the cantonal court or a judge of the cantonal court, and up to 6,600 Swiss Francs for international legal assistance requests;

h) * 90 to 1,200 Swiss Francs for procedures before the penal and measures enforcement court and in other criminal court procedures within the meaning of the introductory act to the Swiss Criminal Code.

← Art. 21 GTar - Procedure Before the Judge and the Youth Court Act fixing the tariff of fees and costs before judicial or administrative authorities (LTar) - Scope of Application Art. 23 GTar - Procedure before Administrative Authorities →

Need to analyze how this provision applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this statute against case law, commentaries, and related legislative provisions inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Court Decisions Applying This Provision (71)

P3 25 13 · vs (Art. 22 lit. g GTar)
Appeal Regarding Dismissal of Criminal Proceedings and Compensation for Wrongful Custody
Cited in the reasoning (point 3.1) to establish the applicable range for the court fee allocated in dispositive order 4.
P1 23 160 · vs (art. 13 et 22 let. f LTar)
Appellant v. State: Consumption of High-THC Cannabis vs. Minimal Quantity Exception
Used to set the amount of the appeal procedure costs.
P1 24 142 · vs (Art. 22 Abs. 1 lit. b GTar)
Riot and Assault Conviction Appeals with Counsel Fee Review
Cited for determining the court fee for the preliminary procedure.
P1 24 142 · vs (Art. 22 Abs. 1 lit. c GTar)
Riot and Assault Conviction Appeals with Counsel Fee Review
Cited for determining the court fee for the main procedure before the District Court.
P1 24 142 · vs (Art. 22 Abs. 1 lit. f GTar)
Riot and Assault Conviction Appeals with Counsel Fee Review
Cited for determining the court fee for the appeal concerning the defense counsel's indemnity.
A3 24 19 · vs (art. 22 let. f LTar)
Owners Fined for Unauthorized Building Use Despite Expired Permit Appeal Window
Cited in relation to the fixing of the procedural costs.
P3 24 260 · vs (Art. 22 lit. g GTar)
Prosecutor's Discontinuance of Misappropriation Case Overturned Due to Insufficient Evidence and Contradictory Statements
Cited to specify the range for setting the court fee in appeal proceedings before a Cantonal Court judge.
P3 24 194 · vs (Art. 22 lit. g GTar)
Appeal Dismissed: Denial of Conditional Release for Convicted Sex Offender
Cited in the reasoning regarding the applicable fee range, but not explicitly in the final orders.
P1 22 100 · vs (art. 22 let. f LTar)
Appeal Court Upholds Conviction for Sexual Misconduct Against Cousin
Range of fees for appeal proceedings.
A1 24 118 · vs (art. 22 al. 1 let. f LTar)
Inmate Disciplinary Sanctions Appeal: Right to be Heard and Proportionality of Penalties
Cited in the reasoning section (Considerant 5.3) regarding the fee limits, but not explicitly repeated in the dispositive orders 1-5. Therefore, excluded.
P1 23 119 · vs (art. 22 let. f LTar)
Narcotics Trafficking Sentence Reduction and Fee Re-evaluation
Article applied to determine the basis for calculating the allocation of costs in the context of the cantonal tariff.
P2 22 48 · vs (Art. 22 lit. g GTar)
Pre-trial Detention Ordered Due to High Flight Risk Following Sentence Increase
Cited analogously to set the court fee based on the complexity and nature of the case.
P1 23 142 · vs (Art. 22 lit. f GTar)
Appeal Against Deportation Order Following Theft Conviction
Used to determine the amount of the court fee (Gerichtsgebühr) for the appeal proceedings.
P3 24 23 · vs (Art. 22 lit. g GTar)
Heirs v. Public Prosecutor (Death Following Fall at Public Toilet)
Cited in the reasoning to set the range for the court fee in appeal proceedings.
P1 22 59 · vs (art. 22 let. f LTar)
Motorcyclist Overtaking Moped Turning at Intersection: Reclassification of Serious Traffic Violation
Cited in the reasoning section regarding the appeal fee scale, but not explicitly in the final orders 1-4.