172.6
VVRGLPJA
CH-VS
CH-VS
Art. 80 Act on Administrative Procedure and Jurisdiction (LPJA) - d) Referral
The Administration of Justice by the Cantonal Court - The Cantonal Court as an Appeal Instance - Administrative Jurisdiction
Art. 80 VVRG · d) Referral
1. The following provisions are applicable by analogy to the appeal procedure
a) * Right to appeal: Art. 44;
b) Time limit for appeal: Art. 46;
c) Appeal brief: Art. 48 to 50;
d) * Effect and instruction of the appeal: Articles 51 and 53 to 58;
e) * Admissibility of the appeal and decision on the appeal: Articles 59, 60, and 61a;
f) * Clarification and correction: Article 64.
2. With respect to the reasoning and issuance of the decision, Articles 29 and 30 are applicable. If an ordinary legal remedy is available to a federal authority, it must be indicated.
Court Decisions Applying This Provision (1,006)
A1 25 26 · vs (art. 80 al. 1 let. e LPJA)
Appellant Denied Electronic Monitoring Due to High Risk of Reoffending
Cited in the dispositive as a procedural basis for rejecting the appeal.
A1 25 79 · vs (art. 80 al. 1 let. e et 60 al. 1 LPJA)
Contractor Bid Increase Justifies Public Contract Revocation
Provision used to reject the appeal as the appellant was entirely unsuccessful.
F1 24 124 · vs (art. 80 al. 1 let. e LPJA)
Taxpayer Appeal Regarding 2018 Assessment: Undisclosed Distributions, Loan Disallowance, and Share Valuation
Cited in the dispositive regarding the partial rejection of the appeal and confirmation of the challenged decision for the remainder.
A3 24 20 · vs (art. 80 al. 1 let. d, 56 al. 1 et 17 al. 2 LPJA)
Construction Company Fined for Unauthorised and Non-Compliant Retaining Walls
Cited in consideration 2 regarding the administrative filing of the case documents, but not in the dispositive orders.
A1 25 92 · vs (art. 80 al. 1 let. e LPJA)
Victim Compensation Limitation Period and Lawyer's Imputed Responsibility
The appeal was rejected based on this procedural provision.
F1 24 123 · vs (art. 80 al. 1 let. e et 60 al. 1 LPJA)
Taxpayers Appeal Taxation of Lebanese Bank Assets Despite Economic Crisis
Cited alongside other provisions confirming the rejection of the appeal.
A1 25 17 · vs (art. 80 al. 1 let. e et 60 al. 1 LPJA)
Building Permit Denial Upheld Despite Preliminary Favorable Opinion
The main provision used to reject the administrative appeal.
A1 25 110 · vs (art. 80 al. 1 let. e et 60 al. 1 LPJA)
Revocation of Electronic Monitoring Upheld Due to Repeated Violations
The court explicitly cited these provisions to justify the final rejection of the appeal.
A1 24 126 · vs (Art. 80 Abs. 1 lit. a i.V.m. Art. 44 VVRG)
Bid Challenge Regarding Plastering Contract Award Dismissed
Used to confirm the applicant's standing to appeal (legitimation) based on a realistic chance of receiving the award.
A1 24 126 · vs (Art. 80 Abs. 1 lit. c i.V.m. Art. 48 VVRG)
Bid Challenge Regarding Plastering Contract Award Dismissed
Used to confirm that the appeal was filed on time.
A1 25 11 · vs (art. 80 al. 1 let. e LPJA)
Administrative Appeal Against Expropriation Compensation Based on Insufficient Comparables
Used to order the annulment of the decision and its remittance to the Commission.
A1 24 222 · vs (Art. 60 al. 1 LPJA par renvoi de l’art. 80 al. 1 let. e LPJA)
Chalet Expansion Permit Overturned Due to Zoning Incompetence
Cited in the final order to reject the administrative appeal.
A1 25 13 · vs (art. 80 al. 1 let. e et 60 al. 1 LPJA)
Appeal Regarding Stainless Steel Fittings Contract Award Upheld Despite Procedural Irregularity
Cited as the legal basis for rejecting the appeal.
A1 24 176 · vs (art. 56 al. 2 aLIPDA/LIPDA cum art. 44 al. 1 let. b LPJA, par renvoi de l’art. 80 al. 1 let. a LPJA)
Administrative Appeal Regarding Access to Official Reports
Cited to establish the standing of the appellant (the Ombudsman) to file the appeal.
A1 24 176 · vs (art. 80 al. 1 let. b et c LPJA)
Administrative Appeal Regarding Access to Official Reports
Cited as procedural basis for applying articles 46 and 48 LPJA to the appeal.