172.6
VVRGLPJA
CH-VS
Art. 48 Act on Administrative Procedure and Jurisdiction (LPJA) - Complaint Document
The Appeal Procedure before Administrative Authorities - Appeal Deadline, Grounds for Appeal, and Appeal Letter
Art. 48 VVRG - Complaint Document · Complaint Document
1. The appeal document must be submitted to the appellate authority in as many copies as there are interested parties.
2. The appeal document must include a concise statement of the facts and the grounds, indicating the evidence, as well as the requests. It must be signed and dated by the appellant or their representative.
3. A copy of the contested decision and the documents cited as evidence must be attached, insofar as the appellant has them in their possession.
Court Decisions Applying This Provision (85)
A1 24 126 · vs (Art. 80 Abs. 1 lit. c i.V.m. Art. 48 VVRG)
Bid Challenge Regarding Plastering Contract Award Dismissed
Used to confirm that the appeal was filed on time.
A1 24 117 · vs (Art. 80 Abs. 1 lit. b und c i.V.m. Art. 46 und Art. 48 VVRG)
Building Permit Appeal Regarding Parking Servitude
Cited in the reasoning (E. 1.5) to confirm that the appeal was filed in time and in the required form.
A1 25 42 · vs (Art. 80 Abs. 1 lit. b und c i.V.m. Art. 46 und Art. 48 VVRG)
Cantonal Appeal Dismissed for Improper Electronic Filing
The court did not enter upon the appeal because it was neither filed within the time limit nor in the proper form.
A1 24 45 · vs (art. 48 al. 2 LPJA)
Residence Permit Revocation Based on Public Financial Burden Despite Family Ties
Cited regarding the motivation requirements for the appeal.
A1 24 96 · vs (Art. 80 Abs. 1 lit. b und c i.V.m. Art. 46 und Art. 48 VVRG)
Property Owners' Association Appeal Regarding Road Resurfacing as Material Expropriation
Cited in the reasoning section to confirm the admissibility of the appeal before dismissing it.
A3 24 13 · vs (Art. 48 Abs. 2 i.V.m. Art. 80 Abs. 1 lit. c VVRG)
Appeal Against Jointly Imposed Fine on Grounds of Individualized Sanction Principle
Cited in the reasoning (2) to define the scope of review by the court (limits the court to reviewing challenged points).
A1 24 72 · vs (Art. 48 Abs. 2 VVRG)
Weapons Confiscation Upheld Due to Psychiatric Risk Assessment
Cited to define the scope of review, limiting the court to reviewing challenged points.
A1 24 72 · vs (Art. 48 VVRG)
Weapons Confiscation Upheld Due to Psychiatric Risk Assessment
Cited as part of the procedural basis for entering into the appeal (form and substance).
A1 24 51 · vs (art. 48 al. 2 LPJA, applicable par renvoi de l'article 80 al. 1 let. c LPJA)
Appellant v. Municipality: Building Permit Denial and Terrace Construction
Used to declare the third grievance (violation of proportionality) inadmissible because the appellant did not challenge the specific reasoning of the State Council on this point.
A1 24 27 · vs (Art. 48 VVRG)
Cantonal Council Water Protection Zone Width Dispute
Cited in the reasoning (E. 1.4) and E. 2 as part of the procedural basis for entering the appeal on the merits and the scope of review.
A1 24 27 · vs (Art. 80 Abs. 1 lit. b und c i.V.m. Art. 46 und Art. 48 VVRG)
Cantonal Council Water Protection Zone Width Dispute
Cited in the reasoning (E. 1.4) to confirm that the appeal was admissible regarding form and timeliness, which underpins the decision to hear the case, but not directly cited in the operative part (dispositive).
A1 24 3 · vs (Art. 80 Abs. 1 lit. b und c i.V.m. Art. 46 und Art. 48 VVRG)
Construction Company Challenge to Administrative Road Renovation Bid Scoring Upheld
Cited to confirm that the appeal was admissible regarding form and deadline.
A1 24 3 · vs (Art. 80 Abs. 1 lit. c i.V.m. Art. 48 Abs. 2 VVRG)
Construction Company Challenge to Administrative Road Renovation Bid Scoring Upheld
Cited to define the scope of review, limiting the court to the points raised by the appellant.
A1 23 172 · vs (Art. 80 Abs. 1 lit. b und c i.V.m. Art. 46 und Art. 48 VVRG)
Administrative Appeal Dismissal Upheld Due to Untimely Initial Filing Against Land Registry Denial
Used to rule on the admissibility (entry into procedure) of the appeal based on procedural requirements.
A1 23 134 · vs (Art. 80 Abs. 1 lit. b und c i.V.m. Art. 46 und Art. 48 VVRG)
Appeal Against Building Permit Revocation Dismissed
Cited to confirm that the appeal was admissible regarding form and deadlines.