Legislator Case Law & Legislation
173.36 LPA-VDLJPA CH-VD

Art. 65 Administrative Procedure Act (LPA-VD) - Procedure

Chapter III, Section II
Open official source Full Act (122 Articles) Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Art. 65 LPA-VD - Procedure · Procedure

1. If the petitioner intends to invoke one of the grounds mentioned in Article 64, paragraph 2, letters b) and c), they must file their request within ninety days from the discovery of said ground.

2. In the case provided for in Article 64, paragraph 2, letter b), the right to request a review additionally expires ten years from the notification of the decision.

3. Requests based on other grounds may be filed at any time.

4. The request for review does not have suspensive effect, unless otherwise decided by the authority.

← Art. 64 LPA-VD - Principles Administrative Procedure Act (LPA-VD) - Purpose Art. 66 LPA-VD - Principles →

Need to analyze how this provision applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this statute against case law, commentaries, and related legislative provisions inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Court Decisions Applying This Provision (15)

GE.2023.0169 · vd (art. 65 al. 1 et 2 LPA-VD)
Administrative Court Upholds Denial of Trainee Lawyer Registration Over Expired Exam Attempts
Cited in the reasoning as the legal basis for the appeal to the Tribunal cantonal, although not explicitly in the final orders, its procedural context is established.
PE.2021.0054 · vd (art. 65 al. 4 LPA-VD)
Population Service v. Resident Permit Applicant (Mandatory Objection Procedure)
Cited in the reasoning, noting that a request for review generally has no suspensive effect, which is relevant context for the procedural path taken, though the final decision relies on inadmissibility under LPA-VD rules.
PE.2020.0096 · vd (Art. 65 al. 1 LPA-VD)
Appeal Against Refusal to Review Residence Permit Conversion Denial Due to Continued Reliance on Public Assistance
This article on deadlines for invoking specific grounds for review is cited in the reasoning, but not in the operative orders.
PE.2019.0043 · vd (Art. 65 al. 1 LPA-VD)
Appeal Against Removal Order for Undocumented Resident Mother Based on Post-Decision Family Changes
Cited to explain the time limit for invoking certain grounds for reconsideration.
PE.2018.0395 · vd (art. 65 al. 1 LPA-VD)
Asylum Seeker Residency Permit Reconsideration Denial Upheld Due to Insufficiently Stable Integration
Cited in the reasoning section regarding the time limit for invoking certain grounds for re-examination.
GE.2019.0003 · vd (art. 65 LPA-VD)
Appeal Admissibility Due to Untimely Filing and Procedural Errors
Cited in the reasoning section regarding the proper procedure for requesting a re-examination by the administrative authority.
PE.2018.0140 · vd (art. 65 al. 1 LPA-VD)
Residency Revocation Reconsideration Appeal by Convicted National
Cited in the reasoning to explain the deadline for invoking certain grounds for re-examination.
GE.2017.0177 · vd (art. 65 LPA-VD)
Attorney Recusal Denial in Bar Disciplinary Investigation
This procedural article was cited to confirm the admissibility of the appeal to the Cantonal Tribunal.
GE.2015.0175 · vd (Art. 65 al. 1 LPA-VD)
Employee Misconduct Warning Review Refusal Upheld
Cited in the reasoning when discussing the deadline for requesting a review of the decision.
GE.2015.0175 · vd (Art. 65 al. 2 LPA-VD)
Employee Misconduct Warning Review Refusal Upheld
Cited in the reasoning regarding the expiry of the right to request review based on facts that could not have been known earlier.
GE.2015.0175 · vd (Art. 65 al. 3 LPA-VD)
Employee Misconduct Warning Review Refusal Upheld
Cited in the reasoning regarding review requests based on other grounds, which can be submitted at any time.
GE.2015.0175 · vd (Art. 65 al. 4 LPA-VD)
Employee Misconduct Warning Review Refusal Upheld
Cited in the reasoning regarding the non-suspensive effect of the review request.
PE.2012.0425 · vd (Art. 65 LPA-VD)
Foreign National Deportation Reconsideration Appeal Dismissed
Cited in the reasoning section (2.b) detailing the procedure for requesting a review, which informs the court's analysis, but not explicitly cited in the final orders (I-IV).
BO.2010.0006 · vd (art. 65 LPA-VD)
Appeal Regarding Refusal of Study Grants Based on Family Financial Capacity
Cited in the reasoning concerning the possibility of viewing the request as a request for review, although not used in the dispositive for the final decision.
PE.2009.0284 · vd (art. 65 LPA-VD)
Immigration Appeal Dismissed Due to Lack of New Arguments and Criminal Record
Cited in the context of examining the requirements for a request for reexamination (réexamen), which the lower authority addressed.