951.1
VRP
CH-SG
CH-SG
Art. 83 Act on Administrative Justice (VRP) - Deadline
Third Part: Legal Protection in Administrative Disputes - E. Request for the Reopening of Proceedings
Art. 83 VRP - Deadline · Deadline
1. The application for reopening can be submitted within three months after the petitioner becomes aware of the grounds for reopening, but no later than ten years from the issuance of the order or decision.
2. The application for reopening, which claims that the order or decision was influenced by fraud or a criminal act, is not subject to any time limit.
Court Decisions Applying This Provision (5)
B.2017.108 · sg (Art. 83 Abs. 1 VRP)
Driver's License Reopening Denial Following Conditional Reinstatement
Cited to establish the deadline for filing the reopening request (used to confirm timeliness).
B.2017.108 · sg (Art. 83 Abs. 1 VRP)
Resumption of Proceedings Denied Due to Loss of Legal Interest Following Lifting of Provisional License Suspension
Cited in the reasoning to establish the timeliness of the application, but the final order only mandates non-entry into the merits.
B.2012.81 · sg (Art. 83 Abs. 1 VRP)
Tax Revision Denial for Cross-Border Commuter Status
Cited in the reasoning as part of the procedural rules establishing the 90-day deadline for filing a revision request.
B.2012.81 · sg (Art. 83 Abs. 1 VRP)
Tax Revision Denial Upheld Due to Untimely Submission and Lack of Obvious Error
Cited in the reasoning as the applicable procedural rule regarding the 90-day deadline for filing a revision request.
II.1.2011.2 · sg (Art. 83 Abs. 1 und 2 VRP)
Heir Standing to Revoke Land Acquisition Permit After Estate Representative Appointment
These articles concerning the timelines for reopening requests were cited in the reasoning section to establish the procedural framework, although the final order was based on inadmissibility/lack of standing (Art. 81 VRP principle). However, since they were only cited in the reasoning (2.a) and not in the dispositive orders 1-3, they should typically be excluded based on the strict rule. But they are included here because the rule states to include procedural rules applied in the dispositive. Since the dispositive does not explicitly cite any procedural rule, these are excluded based on the primary rule focusing only on provisions explicitly cited in orders 1, 2, and 3.