Legislator Case Law & Legislation
451.21 DSVOPMRPM CH-OW

Art. 29 Ordinance on the Protection of Historical and Cultural Monuments (Monument Protection Ordinance, DSV) - Legal Protection

**Criminal Provision, Substitute Performance, and Legal Protection**
Open official source Full Act (30 Articles) Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Art. 29 Ordinance on the Protection of Architectural and Cultural Monuments (Ordinance on the Protection of Monuments, OPM) - Legal Protection · Legal Protection

1. Appeals against orders and decisions of the Department of Education and Culture, as well as the local municipalities, can be lodged with the Government Council in writing and with reasons within 20 days.

2. Cantonal associations and the cantonal sections of Swiss associations dedicated statutorily to heritage protection, are entitled to submit objections and appeals in the area of monument protection, provided they were established at least ten years prior to filing the objection or appeal.

← Art. 28a Ordinance on the Protection of Architectural and Cultural Monuments (Monument Protection Ordinance, MPO) Ordinance on the Protection of Historical and Cultural Monuments (Monument Protection Ordinance, DSV) - Protection Categories Art. 33 Ordinance on the Protection of Architectural and Cultural Monuments (Monument Protection Ordinance, MPO) - Amendment of Existing Law →

Need to analyze how this provision applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this statute against case law, commentaries, and related legislative provisions inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Court Decisions Applying This Provision (2)

VVGE.1991.92.Nr.6 · ow (Art. 29 Abs. 2 DSV)
Association Standing for Heritage Protection Appeals
Cited as the basis for determining the right of complaint for cantonal associations and cantonal sections of Swiss associations in the field of monument protection.
VVGE.2003.04.Nr.18 · ow (Art. 29 Abs. 2 DSV)
Transportation Club Denied Appeal Over Parking Permit, But Permit Upheld as Temporary Use
This provision grants associations dedicated to heritage protection the right to appeal, which was not applicable to the appellant in this case.