613.000
POLGLPOL
CH-GR
CH-GR
Art. 35 Police Act of the Canton of Graubünden (PolG) - Cost Reimbursement
Costs and Compensation for Damages
Art. 35 PolG - Cost Reimbursement · Cost Reimbursement
1. Anyone who causes police measures may be liable for the costs.
2. The government sets the fees for the official acts and services of the cantonal police. It regulates the conditions for partial or full cost waivers, particularly for events serving idealistic, cultural, touristic, or sporting purposes.
3. The organizer is obliged to provide an adequate order and security service.
Court Decisions Applying This Provision (5)
PVG 2016 3 · gr (Art. 35 Abs. 1 PolG)
Causation Principle in Police Cost Liability for Intoxicated Individual's Conduct
The provision is cited in the dispositive summary (E.3) and the final reasoning (E.3) as the basis for charging the incident costs to the person who caused the police intervention (the disturber/causer principle).
A 2015 27 · gr (Art. 35 Abs. 1 PolG)
Police Cost Recovery for Caused Intervention Despite Acquittal
The court upheld the cost transfer based on the perpetrator principle defined in this article.
PVG 2015 3 · gr (Art. 35 Abs. 1 PolG)
Justification of Police Search vs. Imposition of Search Costs on Subject
The court based its decision on this provision when assessing whether the appellant could be considered the originator of the costs.
A 2014 45 · gr (Art. 35 Abs. 1 PolG)
Police Cost Assessment for Search Operation Overruled Due to Insufficient Evidence and Procedural Violation
The court used this article as the basis for determining the obligation to bear the costs of the police measures.
A 2009 38 · gr (Art. 35 Abs. 1 PolG)
Police Deployment Costs Dispute Following Taxi Fare Argument
Although the court ultimately overturned the decision, the underlying principle for cost allocation (whoever causes police measures must bear the costs) is rooted in this provision.