Legislator Case Law & Legislation
613.000 POLGLPOL CH-GR

Art. 15 Police Act of the Canton of Graubünden (PolG) - Police Custody

1. Police Measures
Open official source Full Act (87 Articles) Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Art. 15 PolG - Police Custody · Police Custody

1. The Cantonal Police may temporarily take a person into police custody if

a) * it is necessary to protect this person or another person against a threat to life, health, or psychological integrity, as well as to prevent or eliminate a significant threat to public safety and order;

b) it is necessary to prevent the imminent commission or continuation of a significant offense;

c) the person has evaded or wishes to evade the execution of a custodial sentence or a detention measure by fleeing;

d) * it is necessary to ensure the execution of a deportation, expulsion, banishment, extradition, a court-ordered summons, or delivery ordered by another authority;

e) * it is necessary to ensure the execution of a deportation, an exclusion, the delivery of minors, or a special measure against violence, threats, or harassment.

2. The person taken into custody must be informed of the reasons for this measure, and they must be given the opportunity to notify a person of their confidence, provided this does not jeopardize the purpose of police custody. If the person is a minor, their legal representative must be notified without delay.

3. The person may not be held in police custody longer than absolutely necessary, but no longer than 24 hours.

← Art. 14 PolG Police Act of the Canton of Graubünden (PolG) - Scope of Application Art. 16 PolG →

Need to analyze how this provision applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this statute against case law, commentaries, and related legislative provisions inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Court Decisions Applying This Provision (1)

PKG 2016 24 · gr (Art. 15 Abs. 1 lit. a PolG)
Acquittal for Violence Against Authorities Due to Void Placement Order
Cited in the reasoning to discuss whether the police action could have been justified under cantonal law, but not used in the final orders.