370.100
VRGLGA
CH-GR
CH-GR
Art. 68 Act on Administrative Justice (VRG) - Subject Matter
Extraordinary Legal Remedies and Appeals - Supervisory Complaint
Art. 68 VRG - Subject Matter · Subject Matter
1. Subject of the Supervisory Complaint may be actions or omissions of administrative authorities, as well as corporations and institutions of cantonal public law, that are subject to supervision by the government.
2. The complaint is only admissible if the alleged legal violation cannot be challenged through legal remedies or actions before the Higher Court or the government.
Court Decisions Applying This Provision (12)
U 2023 85 · gr (Art. 68 Abs. 1 VRG)
Appeal Regarding Landscape Protection Zone Exclusion Denied Due to Lack of Current Interest and Abusive Conduct
This provision is implicitly the basis for ordering costs against the losing party, as reflected in Order 2 (Court costs).
V 2023 1 · gr (Art. 68 cpv. 1 LGA)
Tariff Review Jurisdiction over Municipal Electricity Rates
Mentioned by the Cantonal Government in a previous decision, concerning the subsidiary nature of the supervisory appeal on price setting, which was noted by this Court.
R 2020 83 · gr (Art. 68 Abs. 1 VRG)
Municipality Denies Building Permit for Access Road Renovation Subject to Existing Right-of-Way Servitude
This provision governs the awarding of party compensation (costs), which is imposed on the respondent in order 3.
V 2018 7 · gr (Art. 68 Abs. 1 VRG)
Failure to Specify Object of Constitutional Appeal
Mentioned in the reasoning as the basis for an appeal to the cantonal government (supervisory appeal), which the court declined to forward the case under.
V 2018 7 · gr (Art. 68 Abs. 1 VRG)
Constitutional Appeal Dismissed for Procedural Deficiency Regarding Municipal Council Actions
Mentioned in the reasoning section regarding the proper procedure (Aufsichtsbeschwerde) for general criticism of authority conduct, although not formally applied in the dispositive orders.
R 2015 20 · gr (Art. 68 VRG)
Property Owner v. Municipality: Unlawful Construction and Administrative Enforcement
Cited in the reasoning concerning the procedure for a supervisory appeal, which the court declined to follow by forwarding the request.
V 2013 6 · gr (Art. 68 VRG)
Commission Member Information Request Time-Barred
The alternative appeal, framed as a supervisory appeal, was not admitted because the administrative court lacks jurisdiction over supervisory appeals against municipalities (jurisdiction belongs to the Government).
U 2014 22 · gr (Art. 68 Abs. 1 lit. a VRG)
Social Assistance Termination Appeal Over Unsuitable Community Service
This article is related to the cost allocation when a decision is partly granted, but the court explicitly cited Art. 73 VRG for the cost allocation in order 2. The reasoning section mentions that costs are allocated based on Art. 73 VRG. Since Art. 73 VRG is in the dispositive, it is included. No other procedural article is in the dispositive.
ZF 2008 30 · gr (Art. 68 VRG)
Foundation v. Municipality: Public Law Nature of Care Cost Reimbursement Claim
Mentioned in connection with a supervisory appeal to the Government.
V 2007 4 · gr (Art. 68 ff. VRG)
Challenge to Municipal Infrastructure Fees and Energy Efficiency Surcharge
Cited in the reasoning regarding the court's competence to review the transitional period issue, but not cited in the operative part (dispositive).
V 2007 4 · gr (Art. 68 ff. VRG)
Constitutional Appeal Against Municipal Connection Fees and Development Contributions
Cited in reasoning concerning the procedural decision not to forward the appeal to the Government.
U 2007 6 · gr (Art. 67 KV in Verbindung mit Art. 68 VRG)
Property Co-Owner Challenges Municipal Second Home Replacement Levy
The court noted that jurisdiction for an appeal on supervisory review (Aufsichtsbeschwerde) lies solely with the Cantonal Government according to these provisions.