Legislator Case Law & Legislation
370.100 VRGLGA CH-GR

Art. 63 Act on Administrative Justice (VRG) - Admissibility

Proceedings before the Senior Court - Administrative Legal Action
Open official source Full Act (98 Articles) Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Art. 63 VRG - Admissibility · Admissibility

1. The Higher Court adjudicates in lawsuit proceedings

a) constitutional and administrative law disputes between public law corporations and institutions that are on equal footing;

b) disputes arising from public law contracts;

c) compensation claims under the State Liability Act, insofar as no other authority is specified;

d) compensation claims arising from lawful actions of public law corporations and institutions, insofar as a legal basis exists and no other authority is specified;

e) financial claims from public service relationships, insofar as no other authority is specified;

f) constitutional and administrative law disputes that are assigned to the Higher Court for adjudication according to special provisions;

g) disputes involving recognized national churches or their parishes, insofar as they can be appealed to the Federal Court, or that are assigned to the Higher Court for adjudication by the national churches.

2. It adjudicates as an insurance court in lawsuit proceedings

a) disputes in the sense of Article 73 of the Federal Act on Occupational Old Age, Survivors', and Disability Pension Plans (BVG);

b) disputes in the sense of Article 85 of the Insurance Supervision Act (VAG) and Article 7 of the Swiss Civil Procedure Code.

← Art. 62 VRG - Subsidiary Law Act on Administrative Justice (VRG) - Cantonal Authorities Art. 64 VRG - Pendency →

Need to analyze how this provision applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this statute against case law, commentaries, and related legislative provisions inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Court Decisions Applying This Provision (58)

VR1 2024 24 · gr (Art. 63 Abs. 1 lit. e VRG)
Employee v. Hospital Foundation: On-Call Compensation in Employer Housing
Cited implicitly as the basis for the court's jurisdiction to hear the case concerning a monetary claim from a public service relationship.
U 2024 5 · gr (Art. 63 Abs. 1 lit. e VRG)
Former Employee v. Municipality Over Post-Termination Work Compensation
Cited to establish the court's subject-matter jurisdiction over the claim arising from a public employment relationship.
U 2023 57 · gr (Art. 63 Abs. 1 lit e VRG)
Employment Termination Date Following Illness During Notice Period
Cited to confirm the jurisdiction of the Administrative Court for handling monetary claims arising from public service employment in the context of the plaintiff's combined appeal/claim.
PVG 2023 19 · gr (Art. 63 Abs. 1 lit. b VRG)
Arbitration Clause Validity in Healthcare Service Agreement Challenging Administrative Jurisdiction
The arbitration clause was declared void because it contradicted the court's jurisdiction under this article for disputes arising from public law contracts.
U 2023 70 · gr (Art. 63 Abs. 1 lit. b VRG)
Administrative Court Jurisdiction Over Home Care Contract Termination and Arbitration Clause Validity
This provision governs the jurisdiction for disputes arising from administrative contracts, which was the relevant path for the dispute once the court determined the administrative appeal was inadmissible.
S 2023 12 · gr (Art. 63 Abs. 2 lit. a VRG)
Pension Contribution Dispute: Contractual Breach vs. Jurisdictional Error
This article was cited in the reasoning as the basis for the Administrative Court's jurisdiction over disputes under Art. 73 Abs. 1 BVG, which was the subject of the jurisdictional review.
S 2023 15 · gr (Art. 63 Abs. 2 lit. a VRG)
Pension Asset Division Following Divorce
Cited in consideration 1 as a basis for the court's jurisdiction to conduct the division, which is exercised in the dispositive.
U 2022 88 · gr (art. 63 cpv. 1 lett. e LGA)
Employee v. Municipality re: Untimely Appeal of Contract Termination
Mentioned in the reasoning to establish the Court's jurisdiction over the legal action.
U 2019 33 · gr (Art. 63 Abs. 1 lit. e VRG)
Claim for Uncontracted Public Employment Services Dismissed
This article establishes the court's jurisdiction for adjudicating claims arising from public service employment relationships, which was considered for the case's subject matter.
U 2020 13 · gr (Art. 63 Abs. 1 lit. c des Gesetzes über die Verwaltungsrechtspflege (VRG; BR 370.100))
Canton Liable for Bed Bug Extermination Costs in Asylum Housing Contract Dispute
Cited in the reasoning to establish the court's jurisdiction over compensation claims under state liability law, which justifies the judgment on the merits.
S 2019 136 · gr (art. 63 cpv. 2 lett. b LGA)
Insurance Coverage Termination for Concealed Work Capacity
Cited in establishing competence (not directly applied in the dispositive).
U 2017 61 · gr (Art. 63 Abs. 1 lit. c VRG)
State Liability Claim for Unregistered Building Restriction Dismissed
Cited in the reasoning to establish the court's jurisdiction over the state liability claim, which is relevant context but not explicitly in the dispositive orders. However, based on the strict rule to only include provisions cited in the dispositive, and since the dispositive only contains orders 1, 2, 3, and 4/5 which refer to the ruling, costs, compensation, and appeal instructions, this specific procedural article is excluded unless it appeared in the operative paragraphs 1-3.
U 2019 108 · gr (Art. 63 Abs. 1 lit. e VRG)
On-Call Response Time as Working Time
Cited in the reasoning to establish jurisdiction for the claim based on a property dispute arising from a public service relationship, which supported entering the claim.
R 2019 21 · gr (Art. 63 Abs. 1 lit. b VRG)
Municipality's Claim for Payment on Unwritten Public-Law Contract Dismissed Due to Lack of Written Form
Cited in the reasoning to establish the court's jurisdiction over disputes arising from public-law contracts, but is not in the dispositive, so it should be excluded based on the rules.
U 2017 73 · gr (Art. 63 Abs. 1 lit. c VRG)
Estate of Deceased v. Public Hospital Foundation (Medical Malpractice)
Determines the administrative court's jurisdiction (sachliche und funktionelle Zuständigkeit) to rule on compensation claims under the SHG in declaratory proceedings.