Legislator Case Law & Legislation
741.21 SSVOSROSSTR CH

Art. 67 Ordinance of September 5, 1979, on Road Signage (OSR) - Binding Nature of Signs and Instructions

OSR; Chapitre 7 Signes et instructions de la police
Open official source Full Act (136 Articles) Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Art. 67 OSR · Binding Nature of Signs and Instructions

Road users are required to comply with the signs and instructions given: a. by uniformed police officers and auxiliary police; b. by military personnel tasked with directing traffic and uniformed staff of fire services and civil defense; c. by school patrols, company employees, and cadets assigned to direct traffic when they wear the insignia of their function; d. by staff at road construction sites; e. by customs officers near customs offices and, for customs controls, in the area close to the border, as well as by duly identified sales and control personnel employed by customs offices in the execution of the March 19, 2010, law on highway vignettes; f. by operating personnel near railway tracks; g. by drivers of public vehicles in line traffic on mountain postal roads (Art. 38, para. 3, OCR); h. by members of private traffic services equipped with distinctive signs; i. by personnel of convoy vehicles indicated as special vehicles and special transports.

Signs and instructions given by other persons must be observed when they are intended to prevent a danger or to regulate traffic in a difficult situation.

To have traffic regulated by school patrols, by company employees or cadets (para. 1, letter c), by private traffic services (para. 1, letter h), or by personnel of convoy vehicles indicated (para. 1, letter i), it is necessary to obtain authorization from the cantonal police authority. This authority gives the necessary orders; it may delegate its competence to local police authorities.

← Art. 66 OSR Ordinance of September 5, 1979, on Road Signage (OSR) - Contents, Abbreviations, and Definitions Art. 68 OSR →

Need to analyze how this provision applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this statute against case law, commentaries, and related legislative provisions inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Court Decisions Applying This Provision (23)

SB240040 · zh (Art. 90 Abs. 1 SVG in Verbindung mit Art. 27 Abs. 1 SVG, Art. 66 Abs. 1 lit. a SSV und Art. 67 Abs. 1 lit. h SSV)
Appellant v. Municipality on Traffic Obstruction
The accused was found guilty of negligent violation of traffic regulations under these combined provisions in the final order.
CPEN.2023.24 · ne (Art. 67 al. 1 OSR)
Appeal Regarding Bodily Harm, Coercion, and Traffic Offenses
Basis for the conviction for refusal to comply with signs given by construction site personnel.
BKBES.2020.152 · so (Art. 67 Abs. 1 lit. h SSV)
Cyclist Injury on Closed Course: Appeal Dismissed Against Non-Prosecution of Unknown Parties
Cited in the reasoning regarding the binding nature of instructions from marked private traffic service personnel, which supports the ultimate decision.
SK 2020 224 · be (Art. 67 Abs. 1 Bst. c SSV)
Cyclist Causation in Traffic Signal Violation
Cited in the dispositive (I. 'und in Anwendung der Artikel') as a basis for finding the accused guilty (rule violated concerning yielding to traffic control officers).
CPEN.2019.76 · ne (art. 66 et 67 OSR)
Kosovan Resident Appeals Conviction, Sentence, and Expulsion Following Drug Trafficking and Theft
Cited in the operative part for traffic offenses.
SU180027 · zh (Art. 67 Abs. 1 lit. a SSV)
Appellant v. State: Admissibility of Evidence and Credibility of Witness in Traffic Violation Case
Cited in conjunction with other provisions for the violation of traffic regulations.
SB170321 · zh (Art. 67 Abs. 1 lit. h SSV)
Negligent and Intentional Traffic Violation Appeal Fails, Simple Violation Upheld
Cited in conjunction with Art. 90 Abs. 1 SVG for the violation of traffic regulations, specifically regarding instructions from traffic controllers.
501 2014 104 · fr (art. 27 al. 1 et 2 LCR en relation avec art. 67 al. 1 lit. a OSR)
Appellate Review of Theft, Property Damage, and Endangerment Convictions with Modified Sentencing
A.________ is recognized guilty of serious violation of LCR (non-observation of police signs).
SB140350 · zh (Art. 67 Abs. 1 lit. h SSV)
R v. Retired Lawyer: Assault, Hit-and-Run, and Traffic Violations Appeal
Cited as a basis for the traffic offense of disregarding a stop signal.
30.2008.153 · ti (art. 67 cpv. 1, 73 cpv. 6 lett. a, 74 cpv. 4 OSStr)
Appeal of Fine for Parking and Traffic Violations Upheld
These articles relate to the specific traffic regulations (parking, safety lines, police orders) that were applied in confirming the original decision.
30.2008.145 · ti (Art. 67 cpv. 1 OSStr)
Traffic Violation and Obstruction Appeal
Cited in the final orders as part of the legal basis for confirming the challenged decision regarding the obligation to respect police orders.
30.2007.49 · ti (art. 67 cpv. 1 OSStr)
Truck Parking Obstruction and Police Direction Violation Appeal Dismissed
This article (regarding the mandatory nature of police instructions) was cited in the final order's preamble as a basis for confirming the decision.
30.2005.427 · ti (art. 67 cpv. 1 lett. a OSStr)
Driver Fails to Obey Officer, Fails to Wear Seatbelt, Fails to Present License Appeal Denied
Cited in the final orders as a legal basis for the original decision that was confirmed.
17.2013.138 · ti (Art. 67 cpv. 1 lett. a OSStr)
Driver Convicted for Disregarding Road Closure at Airolo Motorway Entrance
Part of the legal basis cited regarding the mandatory nature of police instructions for order 1.1.
30.2004.251 · ti (art. 67 cpv. 1 OSStr)
Driver Fails Appeal Against Fine for Traffic Infractions Including Disobeying Officer
Cited among the applicable provisions that led to the rejection of the appeal.