Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
143.1 VRPG CH-AR

Art. 33 Act on Administrative Justice (VRPG) - d) Grounds for Appeal

Section 2: Internal Administrative Legal Protection
Open official source Full Act (58 Articles) Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Art. 33 VRPG - d) Grounds for Appeal · d) Grounds for Appeal

1. An appeal may raise any defects of the prior instance procedure and the contested decision, but in matters concerning enforcement orders (Art. 63), only the unlawfulness or inappropriateness of the enforcement may be challenged.

2. New factual allegations and new evidence are admissible.

← Art. 32 VRPG - c) Right to Appeal Act on Administrative Justice (VRPG) - Scope of Application Art. 34 VRPG - Incorrect Legal Remedy Instruction →

Need to analyze how this provision applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this statute against case law, commentaries, and related legislative provisions inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Court Decisions Applying This Provision (6)

Verwaltung ARGVP 2019 1561 · ar (Art. 33 Abs. 2 VRPG)
Determination of Relevant Income Year for On-Call Duty Substitute Fee Reduction
Cited to support the consideration that the appeal instance generally considers new facts and evidence, even if not known to the lower authority.
OG ERV 17 26 ARGVP 2019 3743 · ar (Art. 33 Abs. 2 VRPG)
Case Concerning Introduction of New Claims in Appeal Regarding Moving Expenses
This provision, cited in connection with Art. 14 VRPG, is the general rule regarding the inadmissibility of new claims in the appeal procedure, which the court ultimately sets aside based on procedural economy.
OG O4V 17 37 ARGVP 2018 3716 · ar (Art. 33 Abs. 2 i. V. m. Art. 59 VRPG)
Residence Permit Extension Based on Subsequent Marriage in Appeal
The court used this provision to establish the scope of permissible new facts in the appeal, leading to the conclusion that the appeal could not be entertained based on new facts.
OG O4V 15 10 · ar (Art. 30 und 33 VRPG i.V.m. Art. 94 Abs. 1 lit. d KV)
Trogen Cantonal Council Election Re-run Due to Pre-Printed Ballots
Cited to explain why the court cannot rule on the appellant's third request concerning a general ban on non-official ballots, as this would constitute abstract norm control.
Verwaltung ARGVP 2005 1420 · ar (Art. 33 Abs. 1 VRPG)
Aesthetic Regulations Review Deference to Municipal Judgment
Cited in the reasoning explaining the scope of review granted to the cantonal appeal authority.
Verwaltung ARGVP 2005 1431 · ar (Art. 33 VRPG)
Submission of New Requests and Evidence in Administrative Proceedings
Cited in relation to the scope of review in appeal proceedings, though the court ultimately found the appeal admissible.