Legislator European & Swiss Legal Corpus
DE FR IT EN
Court Decisions Legislation Analyze in Legislator
I 2023 55 • VG SZ I 2023 55 AI generated

I 2023 55 — Appeal of Sickness Daily Allowance Denial Based on Stable Medical Assessment

Case Number I 2023 55 (SZ_VG_003_I-2023-55_2023-11-09)
Court / Authority
Decision Date
Jurisdiction Canton of Schwyz — Cantonal Courts (CH-SZ)
Open official source ↗ Entscheidsuche mirror ↗ Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Decision Summary (Facts, Holding & Outcome)

AI generated

A claimant appealed a decision concerning sickness daily allowance insurance under mandatory health insurance law, where the lower court had dismissed the claim. The court reasoned that the claimant's continued claim for benefits after a prior medical assessment concluding no further disability was unfounded because the medical records did not show an objective deterioration or new circumstances warranting continued insurance payments beyond the established period.

Headnote / Official Regeste

AI generated
A claimant appealed a decision concerning sickness daily allowance insurance under mandatory health insurance law, where the lower court had dismissed the claim. The court reasoned that the claimant's continued claim for benefits after a prior medical assessment concluding no further disability was unfounded because the medical records did not show an objective deterioration or new circumstances warranting continued insurance payments beyond the established period.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full Text of the Judgment — I 2023 55

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n I 2023 55 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 9. November 2023 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n Dr.iur. Vital Zehnder, Vizepräsident |\n \n|\n |\n Dr.med. Bernhard Zumsteg, Richter Dr.med. Urs Gössi, Richter |\n \n|\n |\n MLaw Joëlle Sigrist, Gerichtsschreiberin |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n A.________, \n Beschwerdeführer, \n vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt B.________, |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n \n|\n |\n C.________, \n Vorinstanz, |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Gegenstand |\n Krankenversicherung (Krankentaggeldversicherung nach KVG) |\n \n\n

\n \n Sachverhalt: