Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
V KK 573/21 AI generated

Supreme Court dismisses appeal to suspend execution of final criminal judgment due to lack of new facts.

Case Number V KK 573/21
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court of Poland rejected the defendant's request to suspend the execution of a final criminal judgment. The defendant argued for a stay based on the final ruling, but the court found no new facts or circumstances warranting such an intervention. Consequently, the court decided not to consider the request, leaving the original judgment in force.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 532 § 1 k.p.k.; Art. 532 § 1 k.p.k. a contrario: A request to suspend the execution of a final judgment is inadmissible if it does not present new facts or circumstances that could alter the legal situation.

Keywords

AI generated
suspension of execution final criminal judgment new facts requirement a contrario interpretation Supreme Court ruling

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 532 § 1 k.p.k.
akt II K […], na podstawie art. 532 § 1 k.p.k. a contrario p o s t a n o w i ł nie uwzględnić wniosku.
Art. 532 § 1 k.p.k. a contrario
akt II K […], na podstawie art. 532 § 1 k.p.k. a contrario p o s t a n o w i ł nie uwzględnić wniosku.
art. 258 § 1 k.k
M.skazanego z art. 258 § 1 k.k.
art. 532 § 1 k.p.k
akt II K […], na podstawie art. 532 § 1 k.p.k.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Sygn. akt V KK 573/21 POSTANOWIENIE Dnia 24 listopada 2021 r.Sąd Najwyższy w składzie: SSN Jacek Błaszczyk w sprawie P. M.skazanego z art. 258 § 1 k.k. i inne po rozpoznaniu w Izbie Karnej na posiedzeniu w dniu 24 listopada 2021 r., wniosku obrońcy skazanego o wstrzymanie wykonania prawomocnego wyroku Sądu Apelacyjnego w […]z dnia 11 marca 2021 r., sygn. akt II AKa […], zmieniającego wyrok Sądu Okręgowego w G.z dnia 4 listopada 2019 r., sygn. akt II K […], na podstawie art. 532 § 1 k.p.k. a contrario p o s t a n o w i ł nie uwzględnić wniosku.