Legislator Case Law & Legislation
V KK 451/18 AI generated

Criminal appeal dismissed for lack of admissibility due to procedural defect in cassation filing.

Case Number V KK 451/18
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Outcome Dismissed

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court dismissed the criminal appeal without substantive review due to a procedural defect in the filing of the cassation. The appellant, charged under Article 212 § 1 of the Criminal Code, filed a cassation appeal against a Supreme Court decision regarding litigation costs. The court ruled that the appeal was inadmissible because it failed to comply with the strict procedural requirements of Article 430 § 1 of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 430 § 1 k.p.k.; Art. 518 k.p.k.: A cassation appeal must strictly adhere to procedural formalities; failure to comply renders the appeal inadmissible and subject to dismissal without examination of the merits.

Keywords

AI generated
cassation appeal admissibility procedural defect dismissal litigation costs appeal Supreme Court procedure criminal code Article 212

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 430 § 1 k.p.k.
Art. 518 k.p.k.
z art. 518 k.p.k. p o s t a n o w i ł: pozostawić zażalenie bez rozpoznania.
art. 212 § 1 k.k
N.oskarżonego z art. 212 § 1 k.k.
art. 518 k.p.k

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Sygn. akt V KK 451/18 POSTANOWIENIE Dnia 20 grudnia 2018 r.Sąd Najwyższy w składzie: SSN Piotr Mirek w sprawie J. N.oskarżonego z art. 212 § 1 k.k. na skutek zażalenia wniesionego przez oskarżonego na postanowienie Sądu Najwyższego z dnia 13 listopada 2018 r., sygn. akt V KK 451/18, w przedmiocie kosztów postępowania kasacyjnego, na podstawie 430 § 1 k.p.k. w zw. z art. 518 k.p.k. p o s t a n o w i ł: pozostawić zażalenie bez rozpoznania.