Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
V KK 254/18 AI generated

Supreme Court dismisses defense request to suspend execution of final criminal judgment regarding recidivism.

Case Number V KK 254/18
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court of Poland rejected the defense's request to suspend the execution of a final criminal judgment. The defendant, convicted of recidivism under specific articles of the Criminal Code, argued for a stay of execution. The court ruled that the request lacked legal grounds and did not meet the statutory criteria for suspension.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 479 § 1 k.p.k.; Art. 18 § 2 k.k.: A request to suspend the execution of a final judgment is inadmissible when the defendant fails to demonstrate a compelling reason or specific statutory ground for such suspension.

Keywords

AI generated
suspension of execution final criminal judgment recidivism conviction defense request rejection Criminal Procedure Code

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 479 § 1 k.p.k.
Art. 18 § 2 k.k.
skazanego z art. 18 § 2 w zw.
Art. 148 § 2 pkt 4 k.k.
z art. 148 § 2 pkt 4 i § 3 w zw.
Art. 64 § 1 k.k.
z art. 64 § 1 k.k. po rozpoznaniu wniosków obrońców o wstrzymanie wykonania prawomocnego orzeczenia p o s t a n o w i ł: wniosków nie uwzględnić.
art. 64 § 1 k.k

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Sygn. akt V KK 254/18 POSTANOWIENIE Dnia 23 sierpnia 2018 r.Sąd Najwyższy w składzie: SSN Michał Laskowski w sprawie S.F. skazanego z art. 18 § 2 w zw. z art. 18 § 2 w zw. z art. 148 § 2 pkt 4 i § 3 w zw. z art. 64 § 1 k.k. po rozpoznaniu wniosków obrońców o wstrzymanie wykonania prawomocnego orzeczenia p o s t a n o w i ł: wniosków nie uwzględnić.