Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
V CSK 67/17 AI generated

Supreme Court dismisses insurance claim for unpaid medical expenses due to procedural defects in the lower court's judgment.

Case Number V CSK 67/17
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court dismissed the cassation appeal filed by the insured against the appellate court's judgment. The insured argued that the lower court failed to properly assess the claim for unpaid medical expenses. The court ruled that the appeal was inadmissible because the underlying judgment contained procedural errors preventing a valid cassation review.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 385 § 1 k.p.c.; Art. 386 § 1 k.p.c.: A cassation appeal is inadmissible if the judgment under review contains procedural defects that preclude a valid review of the merits.

Keywords

AI generated
cassation appeal inadmissibility procedural defects judgment insurance claim dismissal medical expenses dispute Supreme Court review

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 385 § 1 k.p.c.
Art. 386 § 1 k.p.c.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Sygn. akt V CSK 67/17 POSTANOWIENIE Dnia 3 kwietnia 2018 r.Sąd Najwyższy w składzie: SSN Teresa Bielska-Sobkowicz w sprawie z powództwa D. R., A. R. i K. R.‎przeciwko S Towarzystwu Ubezpieczeń E. S. A. w S.‎o zapłatę,‎na posiedzeniu niejawnym w Izbie Cywilnej w dniu 3 kwietnia 2018 r.,‎na skutek skargi kasacyjnej powodów od wyroku Sądu Apelacyjnego we W.‎z dnia 29 września 2016 r., sygn. akt I ACa …/16, podejmuje zawieszone postępowanie.