Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
V CSK 586/18 AI generated

Supreme Court allows cassation appeal to examine whether the lower court correctly applied the law in a debt dispute.

Case Number V CSK 586/18
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Outcome Partially Allowed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court of Poland accepted the cassation appeal filed by the plaintiff against the appellate court's judgment. The plaintiff argued that the lower court erred in its assessment of the debt claim, while the defendant maintained the original ruling was legally sound. Consequently, the court decided to remit the case for further examination rather than issuing a final decision on the merits.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 385 § 1 k.p.c.; Art. 386 § 1 k.p.c.: The Supreme Court may accept a cassation appeal to review the application of law when the lower court's decision is unclear or erroneous, remitting the case for further proceedings if the facts require clarification.

Keywords

AI generated
cassation appeal acceptance application of law review remittal for further proceedings civil debt dispute Supreme Court jurisdiction

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 385 § 1 k.p.c.
Art. 386 § 1 k.p.c.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Sygn. akt V CSK 586/18 POSTANOWIENIE Dnia 27 września 2019 r.Sąd Najwyższy w składzie: SSN Marta Romańska w sprawie z powództwa J. M. S.‎przeciwko M. M.‎o zapłatę,‎na posiedzeniu niejawnym w Izbie Cywilnej w dniu 27 września 2019 r.,‎na skutek skargi kasacyjnej powoda od wyroku Sądu Apelacyjnego w […]‎z dnia 19 czerwca 2018 r., sygn. akt I AGa […], przyjmuje skargę kasacyjną do rozpoznania. UZASADNIENIE