Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
V CSK 577/16 AI generated

Supreme Court allows cassation appeal to examine whether the lower court correctly applied the law in a debt dispute.

Case Number V CSK 577/16
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Outcome Partially Allowed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court accepted the cassation appeal filed by the plaintiff against the appellate court's judgment. The plaintiff argued that the lower court erred in its legal assessment regarding the debt claim, while the defendant maintained the decision was correct. The court decided to refer the case for further examination to determine if the legal application was flawed.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 385 § 1 pkt 1 k.p.c.; Art. 386 § 1 k.p.c.: The Supreme Court accepts a cassation appeal when the lower court has incorrectly applied the law or failed to apply it.

Keywords

AI generated
cassation appeal incorrect application of law civil procedure code debt dispute Supreme Court review

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 385 § 1 pkt 1 k.p.c.
Art. 386 § 1 k.p.c.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Sygn. akt V CSK 577/16 POSTANOWIENIE Dnia 26 kwietnia 2017 r.Sąd Najwyższy w składzie: SSN Agnieszka Piotrowska w sprawie z powództwa […] S. Sp. z o.o. w R.‎przeciwko Gminie O.‎o zapłatę,‎na posiedzeniu niejawnym w Izbie Cywilnej w dniu 26 kwietnia 2017 r.,‎na skutek skargi kasacyjnej strony powodowej od wyroku Sądu Apelacyjnego w […]‎z dnia 18 maja 2016 r., sygn. akt I ACa […], przyjmuje skargę kasacyjną do rozpoznania.