Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
V CSK 433/19 AI generated

Supreme Court dismisses plaintiff's request to supplement the judgment due to lack of new relevant facts.

Case Number V CSK 433/19
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court dismissed the plaintiff's request to supplement the judgment dated December 10, 2019. The plaintiff argued that new facts emerged requiring a revision, but the court found no grounds for such an amendment. Consequently, the request was rejected as it did not meet the legal criteria for supplementing a final decision.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 383 § 1 k.p.c.; Art. 383 § 2 k.p.c.: A request to supplement a judgment is admissible only if new facts or circumstances have arisen that could have influenced the outcome, which was not established here.

Keywords

AI generated
supplementing judgment new facts final decision civil procedure Supreme Court dismissal of request procedural amendment

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 383 § 1 k.p.c.
Art. 383 § 2 k.p.c.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Sygn. akt V CSK 433/19 POSTANOWIENIE Dnia 19 lutego 2020 r.Sąd Najwyższy w składzie: SSN Marian Kocon w sprawie z powództwa M. S. ‎przeciwko J. F. ‎o zapłatę,‎na posiedzeniu niejawnym w Izbie Cywilnej w dniu 19 lutego 2020 r.,‎na skutek wniosku powódki o uzupełnienie postanowienia Sądu Najwyższego z dnia 10 grudnia 2019 r., sygn. akt V CSK 433/19, oddala wniosek. UZASADNIENIE