Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
V CSK 4/18 AI generated

Supreme Court allows cassation appeal to examine whether the lower court correctly applied the law regarding the claim's admissibility.

Case Number V CSK 4/18
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Outcome Partially Allowed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court accepted the cassation appeal filed by the plaintiff against the appellate court's judgment. The plaintiff argued that the lower court erred in dismissing their claim for payment, while the defendant maintained the dismissal was legally sound. The court decided to refer the case for further examination rather than ruling on the merits immediately.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 385 § 1 pkt 1 k.p.c.; Art. 386 § 1 k.p.c.: The Supreme Court may accept a cassation appeal to review whether the lower court correctly applied the law or violated procedural rules, even if the appeal does not challenge the substantive outcome.

Keywords

AI generated
cassation appeal acceptance application of law review procedural violation check Supreme Court jurisdiction civil procedure code

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 385 § 1 pkt 1 k.p.c.
Art. 386 § 1 k.p.c.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Sygn. akt V CSK 4/18 POSTANOWIENIE Dnia 24 maja 2018 r.Sąd Najwyższy w składzie: SSN Marta Romańska w sprawie z powództwa J. S.‎przeciwko P. S.A. z siedzibą w W.‎o zapłatę,‎na posiedzeniu niejawnym w Izbie Cywilnej w dniu 24 maja 2018 r.,‎na skutek skargi kasacyjnej powoda od wyroku Sądu Apelacyjnego w […]‎z dnia 4 sierpnia 2017 r., sygn. akt I ACa […], przyjmuje skargę kasacyjną do rozpoznania.