Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
V CSK 356/18 AI generated

Supreme Court corrects a clerical error in the plaintiff's name within two prior rulings.

Case Number V CSK 356/18
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Outcome Allowed / Granted
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court corrected two previous rulings by replacing the incorrectly entered name 'I.' with the full name 'I.' in the phrase 'against I. M.'. The procedural outcome involved amending the text of earlier decisions to fix a clerical mistake regarding the plaintiff's identity. The court decided to issue this correction because the original entries contained a typographical error that misidentified the party in the legal proceedings.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 379 § 1 k.p.c.; Art. 380 § 1 k.p.c.: The Supreme Court may correct clerical errors in its own rulings to ensure the accurate identification of parties.

Keywords

AI generated
clerical error correction Supreme Court amendment party identification procedural rectification typographical mistake

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 379 § 1 k.p.c.
Art. 380 § 1 k.p.c.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Sygn. akt V CSK 356/18 POSTANOWIENIE Dnia 11 grudnia 2019 r.Sąd Najwyższy w składzie: SSN Teresa Bielska-Sobkowicz w sprawie z powództwa Syndyka masy upadłości V. S.A. w W.‎przeciwko I. M.‎o zapłatę,‎na posiedzeniu niejawnym w Izbie Cywilnej w dniu 11 grudnia 2019 r., prostuje postanowienia Sądu Najwyższego z dnia ‎18 lipca 2018 r. oraz z dnia 7 listopada 2018 r. w ten sposób, ‎że w komparycjach tych postanowień zamiast błędnie wpisanego imienia "I." w zwrocie "przeciwko I. M." wpisuje słowo "I.".