I UK 8/11
AI generated
Supreme Court dismisses appeal; sole shareholder of LLC is not an employee under social security law.
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe Supreme Court dismissed the cassation appeal filed by a sole shareholder against a social security office decision. The court found that the appellant, who held 124 out of 125 shares, was effectively a sole shareholder despite the formal existence of a minor shareholder spouse. Consequently, the court ruled that the appellant did not qualify as an employee under social security law because the separation of labor and capital was absent.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedArt. 8 ust. 6 pkt 4 ustawy o systemie ubezpieczeń społecznych; Art. 22 k.p.: A sole or nearly sole shareholder of a limited liability company does not qualify as an employee for social security purposes due to the lack of genuine separation between labor and capital.
Keywords
AI generated
sole shareholder
limited liability company
social security law
employee status
labor and capital separation
cassation appeal
Supreme Court ruling
Cited Legislation
AI generatedArt. 8 ust. 6 pkt 4 ustawy z dnia 13 października 1998 r. o systemie ubezpieczeń społecznych
Art. 22 k.p.
Art. 31 k.p.
Art. 2 Konstytucji RP
Art. 67 Konstytucji RP
Art. 6 ust. 1 pkt 1 ustawy o systemie ubezpieczeń społecznych
Art. 11 ust. 1 ustawy o systemie ubezpieczeń społecznych
Art. 12 ust. 1 ustawy o systemie ubezpieczeń społecznych
art. 22 k.p
art. 31 k.p
Cited Case Law
AI generatedII UK 33/10
Nie ma zasadniczej kolizji pomiędzy prawem pracy a prawem o spółce z o.o.
II UKN 394/98
Supreme Court dismisses cassation; self-employment claim rejected due to economic dependence despite voting conflict.
I UK 162/08
Supreme Court dismisses social security appeal, confirming a shareholder-manager's employment status entitles them to mandatory social insurance coverage.
II UK 20/11
Wyrok z dnia 12 maja 2011 r.
II UK 177/09
RZECZYPOSPOLITEJ POLSKIEJ Dnia 7 kwietnia 2010 r.
I PK 113/06
II UK 357/09
Supreme Court dismisses appeal; employment contract of sole shareholder-manager ends upon acquiring all shares.
I PK 659/03
Supreme Court allows labor claim dismissal due to lack of employment contract features, remanding for civil law assessment.