Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
II UK 377/10 AI generated

Suspension of business is a legal event requiring registry entry; lack of entry means no social security obligation.

Case Number II UK 377/10
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court dismissed the cassation appeal filed by Barbara M. against the Social Insurance Institution's decision regarding her social security obligations. The court found that while the appellant argued her book-selling business was suspended due to health issues, the lower court correctly determined she ceased conducting the business entirely. The Supreme Court ruled that suspension is a legal event dependent on a formal registry entry, and without such an entry, the cessation of activity remains the factual basis for non-coverage.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 14a ust. 7 ustawy o swobodzie działalności gospodarczej; Art. 13 pkt 4 ustawy o systemie ubezpieczeń społecznych: Suspension of business constitutes a legal event requiring a formal registry entry; without such entry, the cessation of activity prevails, exempting the individual from social security obligations.

Keywords

AI generated
suspension of business social security obligation registry entry requirement cessation of activity cassation appeal dismissal legal event definition formal vs factual cessation

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 14a ust. 7 ustawy o swobodzie działalności gospodarczej
Art. 13 pkt 4 ustawy o systemie ubezpieczeń społecznych
Art. 39813 § 2 k.p.c.
Art. 3983 § 1 pkt 2 k.p.c.
Art. 39814 k.p.c.
art. 39813 § 2 k.p.c
art. 3983 § 1 pkt 2 k.p.c
art. 39814 k.p.c

Cited Case Law

AI generated
II UK 111/03
I UK 105/04
Social security insurance obligation ceases upon factual cessation of business, not just tax registry removal.
I UK 80/05
Social security court ruled that business activity includes preparatory acts and subjective intent, not just actual work.
II UK 221/02
Social security court dismissed pension claim due to lack of verified five-year contribution period.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text