Supreme Court dismisses appeal; non-collegial board will cannot be replaced by custom or later agreements.
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe Supreme Court dismissed the cassation appeal regarding a non-collegial will of the supervisory board to conclude a non-compete agreement with a former executive. The lower courts found the agreement invalid due to the lack of a formal board resolution, noting that while such contracts were standard practice, the specific board member's termination required explicit prior approval. The court rejected the appellant's new argument that a subsequent settlement agreement was an independent civil obligation, ruling that the matter remained strictly within the scope of labor law and the original invalid agreement.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedArt. 379 k.s.h.; Art. 390 § 1 k.s.h.; Art. 388 k.s.h.; Art. 1013 k.p.: A non-collegial will of the supervisory board to conclude a non-compete agreement with a former executive cannot be replaced by practice or custom, and the agreement remains invalid without a formal resolution.