I PK 213/06
AI generated
Supreme Court ruled that a fixed-term employment contract for a CEO is a contract for specific work, not a fixed-term contract.
Poland (PL)
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe Supreme Court of Poland dismissed the plaintiff's claim for damages regarding the termination of his employment contract as CEO. The court found that the contract was explicitly for the duration of performing the specific function of CEO, not for a fixed term or tenure. Consequently, the contract automatically terminated upon the completion of this specific work when the plaintiff was removed from his position.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedart. 25 § 1 k.p.; art. 30 § 1 pkt 5 k.p.; art. 39816 k.p.c.: An employment contract concluded for the performance of a specific function, such as CEO, constitutes a contract for specific work under Polish labor law, terminating automatically upon the cessation of that function.
Keywords
AI generated
employment contract specific work
CEO function termination
fixed term contract distinction
automatic contract termination
labor law Supreme Court
Cited Legislation
AI generatedart. 25 § 1 k.p.
art. 30 § 1 pkt 5 k.p.
art. 39816 k.p.c.
art. 25 § 1 k.p
art. 264 § 2 k.p
art. 50 § 4 k.p
art. 30 § 1 pkt 4 k.p
art. 233 § 1 k.p.c
art. 65 k.c
art. 300 k.p