Legislator Case Law & Legislation
II UZP 3/06 AI generated

Supreme Court rules that a lawyer's practice does not qualify as employment under police pension law.

Case Number II UZP 3/06
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal regarding the inclusion of a lawyer's pre-1999 practice in a police pension calculation. The applicant argued that his time as an advocate should count as half-time employment, but the Pension Fund only recognized his period as an apprentice. The Court held that while advocates share some social security rights with employees, they are not legally considered employees under the specific police pension statute, which requires a formal employment relationship.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 14 ust. 1 pkt 1 ustawy z dnia 18 lutego 1994 r. o zaopatrzeniu emerytalnym funkcjonariuszy Policji...; Art. 24 ust. 1 i art. 37 ustawy z dnia 26 maja 1982 r. - Prawo o adwokaturze: The concept of employment under the police pension law excludes the independent practice of a lawyer, as the statutory system requires a formal employment relationship distinct from the social security rights enjoyed by advocates.

Keywords

AI generated
police pension law lawyer employment status social security system statutory interpretation half-time employment advocate rights pension calculation

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 14 ust. 1 pkt 1 ustawy z dnia 18 lutego 1994 r. o zaopatrzeniu emerytalnym funkcjonariuszy Policji...
Art. 24 ust. 1 i art. 37 ustawy z dnia 26 maja 1982 r. - Prawo o adwokaturze
art. 390 § 1 k.p.c
art. 386 § 6 k.p.c
art. 390 § 2 k.p.c
art. 389 k.p.c
art. 390 k.p.c

Cited Case Law

AI generated

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text