Legislator Case Law & Legislation
II BP 6/05 AI generated

Supreme Court dismissed appeal claiming illegal dismissal, ruling it cannot be used merely to seek compensation for any flawed judgment.

Case Number II BP 6/05
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court dismissed the defendant's extraordinary appeal challenging a final labor court judgment awarding severance pay. The plaintiff argued the law applied to the new private school, causing illegal state damage, while the defendant maintained the public school was liquidated and the new contract was distinct. The court held that such appeals require a qualified, elementary legal violation and cannot serve as a general tool for monetary compensation for any erroneous ruling.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 231 § 1 k.p.; Art. 424 § 1 k.p.c.: An extraordinary appeal for compensation due to illegal public authority action is admissible only if the legal violation is qualified and elementary, not as a means to pursue compensation claims for every flawed court verdict.

Keywords

AI generated
extraordinary appeal illegal public action severance pay qualified violation labor law interpretation

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 231 § 1 k.p.
Art. 424 § 1 k.p.c.
Art. 18 of the Teachers' Charter Act of 26 January 1982
art. 231 § 1 k.p
art. 231 k.p
art. 42411 § 1 k.p.c

Cited Case Law

AI generated
Constitutional Tribunal judgment of 4 December 2001, SK 18/00
Supreme Court judgment of 18 January 2006, II BP 1/05
Supreme Court judgment of 13 December 2005, II BP 3/05
Supreme Court judgment of 13 June 1995, I PRN 29/95
Supreme Court judgment of 17 May 1995, I PRN 15/95

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text