I UZP 3/05
AI generated
Supreme Court dismisses legal question as interpretation already established by prior precedent.
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe Supreme Court of Poland refused to issue a ruling on a legal question regarding the withdrawal of a farmer's pension. The applicant argued that failing to disclose all land in a notarial deed invalidated the pension, while the court noted the lower court did not cite alternative interpretations. Consequently, the court declined to rule because the statutory interpretation was already definitively established in previous decisions.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedArt. 390 § 1 k.p.c.; Art. 61 § 1 ustawy o Sądzie Najwyższym: The Supreme Court may decline to rule on a legal question if the interpretation of the cited provisions has already been established by prior Supreme Court jurisprudence.
Keywords
AI generated
legal question dismissal
precedent interpretation
pension withdrawal
farmer's pension
notarial deed formalities
Supreme Court procedure
statutory interpretation
Cited Legislation
AI generatedArt. 390 § 1 k.p.c.
Art. 61 § 1 ustawy z dnia 23 listopada 2002 r. o Sądzie Najwyższym
ustawa z dnia 14 grudnia 1982 r. o ubezpieczeniu społecznym rolników indywidualnych i członków ich rodzin
ustawa z dnia 27 października 1977 r. o zaopatrzeniu emerytalnym oraz innych świadczeniach dla rolników i ich rodzin
art. 390 § 1 k.p.c
art. 58 § 1 k.c
Cited Case Law
AI generatedIII CZP 136/91
II CZP 89/86