Legislator Case Law & Legislation
I UZP 3/05 AI generated

Supreme Court dismisses legal question as interpretation already established by prior precedent.

Case Number I UZP 3/05
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court of Poland refused to issue a ruling on a legal question regarding the withdrawal of a farmer's pension. The applicant argued that failing to disclose all land in a notarial deed invalidated the pension, while the court noted the lower court did not cite alternative interpretations. Consequently, the court declined to rule because the statutory interpretation was already definitively established in previous decisions.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 390 § 1 k.p.c.; Art. 61 § 1 ustawy o Sądzie Najwyższym: The Supreme Court may decline to rule on a legal question if the interpretation of the cited provisions has already been established by prior Supreme Court jurisprudence.

Keywords

AI generated
legal question dismissal precedent interpretation pension withdrawal farmer's pension notarial deed formalities Supreme Court procedure statutory interpretation

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 390 § 1 k.p.c.
Art. 61 § 1 ustawy z dnia 23 listopada 2002 r. o Sądzie Najwyższym
ustawa z dnia 14 grudnia 1982 r. o ubezpieczeniu społecznym rolników indywidualnych i członków ich rodzin
ustawa z dnia 27 października 1977 r. o zaopatrzeniu emerytalnym oraz innych świadczeniach dla rolników i ich rodzin
art. 390 § 1 k.p.c
art. 58 § 1 k.c

Cited Case Law

AI generated
III CZP 136/91
II CZP 89/86

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text