Legislator Case Law & Legislation
II UK 295/04 AI generated

Social security insurance termination for farmers is not a retrial but a new proceeding based on statutory requirements.

Case Number II UK 295/04
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court dismissed the cassation appeal against a final decision terminating the applicant's farmer social security insurance. The applicant argued for a retrial, but the court clarified that termination occurs only in a new proceeding where the insurer proves the applicant no longer met statutory requirements. The court found the applicant failed to maintain continuous insurance coverage for a full year immediately preceding his new business activity, as required by law.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 36 ust. 1 ustawy o ubezpieczeniu społecznym rolników; Art. 5a ust. 1 ustawy o ubezpieczeniu społecznym rolników: Termination of farmer social security insurance is not a retrial but a new proceeding initiated when the insured ceases to meet statutory requirements.

Keywords

AI generated
farmer social security insurance termination of insurance coverage continuous insurance requirement new proceeding vs retrial business activity commencement statutory compliance cassation appeal dismissal

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 36 ust. 1 ustawy z dnia 20 grudnia 1990 r. o ubezpieczeniu społecznym rolników
Art. 5a ust. 1 ustawy z dnia 20 grudnia 1990 r. o ubezpieczeniu społecznym rolników
Art. 393 § 1 k.p.c.
Art. 3 ustawy z dnia 22 grudnia 2004 r. o zmianie ustawy - Kodeks postępowania cywilnego
art. 233 § 1 k.p.c
art. 145 § 1 k.p
art. 155 k.p
art. 16 § 1 k.p
art. 39312 k.p.c

Cited Case Law

AI generated

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text