Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
I UK 11/05 AI generated

Final war invalidity ruling does not bar new pension claims if medical conditions have changed since the original decision.

Case Number I UK 11/05
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Decision Date
Outcome Allowed / Granted
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court allowed the applicant's new pension claim, overturning the lower court's dismissal based on a prior final judgment. Although a final ruling previously established that the applicant's disability was not caused by wartime injuries, the court found that subsequent medical evidence demonstrated a change in the applicant's health status. The court held that such changes open the door for a new claim, requiring the social insurance agency to review the application on its merits without being bound by the old determination.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 7 ust. 1 ustawy z dnia 29 maja 1974 r. o zaopatrzeniu inwalidów wojennych i wojskowych oraz ich rodzin; zmiana okoliczności zawsze otwiera drogę do ponownego rozpoznania sprawy. Stwierdzenie prawomocnym wyrokiem, że inwalidztwo nie było następstwem zranień w walce z wrogiem, może być obalone w każdym czasie w postępowaniu na podstawie nowego wniosku.

Keywords

AI generated
wartime disability pension final judgment res judicata change of circumstances new medical evidence social insurance law reopening of proceedings invalidity assessment

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 7 ust. 1 ustawy z dnia 29 maja 1974 r. o zaopatrzeniu inwalidów wojennych i wojskowych oraz ich rodzin
art. 114 ustawy z dnia 17 grudnia 1998 r. o emeryturach i rentach z Funduszu Ubezpieczeń Społecznych
art. 199 § 1 pkt 2 k.p.c.
art. 379 pkt 3 k.p.c.
art. 83 ust. 2 ustawy z dnia 13 października 1998 r. o systemie ubezpieczeń społecznych
art. 199 § 1 pkt 2 k.p.c
art. 199 § 2 pkt 1 k.p.c
art. 366 k.p.c
art. 379 pkt 3 k.p.c
art. 39315 k.p.c

Cited Case Law

AI generated
II UK 403/03
Supreme Court allows appeal, ruling social fund decisions on extra fees require substantive and purposeful judicial review.
III UK 35/04
II UZP 18/96
Social security court allows re-evaluation of farmer pension rights under old law after new evidence submitted post-act change.
II UZP 7/78
II URN 131/83
II URN 182/86
II UKN 50/96
Social security pension review requires special statute over civil code; error in insurance period does not bar retrial.
II UKN 231/99
Final judgment bars re-litigation of social security benefits unless new evidence or circumstances exist.
II UK 139/02
Supreme Court dismisses appeal when new evidence is not presented to reopen a final pension denial decision.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text