III PK 27/05
AI generated
Employee entitled to non-public company non-compete compensation even if deemed excessive.
Poland (PL)
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe Supreme Court dismissed the cassation appeal, remanding the case to the Court of Appeal for a new ruling on costs. The plaintiff sought a high non-compete compensation amount, arguing it was excessive, while the defendant contended the sum violated good faith principles. The court held that a legally concluded non-compete agreement remains valid and enforceable even if the compensation is later deemed excessive by a court.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedArt. 1011 k.p.; Art. 58 k.c. in conjunction with Art. 300 k.p.: A non-compete agreement concluded in compliance with law and good faith is valid, and an employee is entitled to the agreed compensation even if a court deems it excessive.
Keywords
AI generated
non-compete agreement
excessive compensation
good faith principles
non-public company
employee entitlement
Cited Legislation
AI generatedArt. 1011 k.p.
Art. 58 k.c.
Art. 300 k.p.
Art. 8 k.p.
Art. 482 k.c.
art. 1011 k.p
art. 3531 k.c
art. 300 k.p
art. 58 § 2 k.c
art. 13 k.p