Legislator Case Law & Legislation
I UK 236/04 AI generated

Social security appeal dismissed; employer not a party despite employment contract validity.

Case Number I UK 236/04
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court dismissed the cassation appeal filed by the pension authority against a lower court ruling that declared the applicant subject to social security. The applicant, a pregnant woman, had a fixed-term contract with an employer who was unaware of her pregnancy, leading to a dispute over the validity of the employment relationship. The court held that the employer was not a 'interested party' under the Civil Procedure Code because the contested contract was valid and the applicant's rights were directly affected, making the employer's participation unnecessary.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 47711 k.p.c.; Art. 391 § 1 k.p.c.; Art. 393 § 12 k.p.c.; Art. 83 k.c.; Art. 6 ust. 1 pkt 1 ustawy o systemie ubezpieczeń społecznych; Art. 11 ust. 1 ustawy o systemie ubezpieczeń społecznych: The employer is not an interested party in social security proceedings regarding the validity of an employment contract unless their rights are directly affected, and a mere desire to obtain benefits does not constitute a sham contract.

Keywords

AI generated
social security interested party sham contract cassation appeal employment contract pension authority civil procedure code

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 47711 k.p.c.
Art. 391 § 1 k.p.c.
Art. 393 § 12 k.p.c.
Art. 83 k.c.
Art. 6 ust. 1 pkt 1 ustawy o systemie ubezpieczeń społecznych
Art. 11 ust. 1 ustawy o systemie ubezpieczeń społecznych
art. 47711 k.p.c
art. 32 Konstytucji
art. 83 k.c
art. 58 k.c

Cited Case Law

AI generated

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text