Legislator Case Law & Legislation
II PK 106/04 AI generated

Supreme Court dismisses claim that overtime pay is denied to managers due to organizational duties.

Case Number II PK 106/04
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court dismissed the cassation appeal filed by a manager against a lower court's dismissal of his overtime pay claim. The court found that the appellate court incorrectly shifted the burden of proving overtime work onto the employee rather than the employer. Consequently, the Supreme Court ruled that the employer, not the manager, bears the primary obligation to organize working hours and maintain accurate records.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 94 pkt 2 k.p.; Art. 100 k.p.; Art. 12911 k.p.; Art. 6 k.c.; Art. 300 k.p.; Art. 231 k.p.c.; Art. 233 k.p.c.; Art. 39313 § 1 k.p.c.: The employer bears the primary obligation to organize working time and maintain records of overtime; an employee's managerial role does not absolve the employer of this duty, and the burden of proof regarding overtime work rests with the employer.

Keywords

AI generated
overtime compensation managerial duties burden of proof working time organization labor law cassation appeal employer obligations

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 94 pkt 2 k.p.
Art. 100 k.p.
Art. 12911 k.p.
Art. 6 k.c.
Art. 300 k.p.
Art. 231 k.p.c.
Art. 233 k.p.c.
Art. 39313 § 1 k.p.c.
art. 135 k.p
art. 100 § 1 k.p

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text