Legislator Case Law & Legislation
III PK 6/04 AI generated

Supreme Court dismissed appeal against judgment and order denying amendment in labor dispute case.

Case Number III PK 6/04
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court dismissed the plaintiff's appeal against both the second-instance judgment and the order denying the request to amend the judgment. The plaintiff argued that the court erred in dismissing claims against one of two defendant companies while awarding relief against the other. The court rejected this, noting the plaintiff had a valid procedural interest in challenging the partial dismissal of claims against the second defendant.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 393 § 1 k.p.c.; Art. 393 § 5 k.p.c.; Art. 393 § 8 k.p.c.; Art. 378 § 2 k.p.c.; Art. 73 § 1 k.p.c.; Art. 73 § 2 k.p.c.: An appeal against a judgment partially dismissing claims against one of multiple defendants is admissible if the appellant retains a legal interest in the outcome regarding the remaining defendants.

Keywords

AI generated
labor dispute partial dismissal multiple defendants procedural interest amendment of judgment civil procedure code supreme court review

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 393 § 1 k.p.c.
Art. 393 § 5 k.p.c.
Art. 393 § 8 k.p.c.
Art. 378 § 2 k.p.c.
Art. 73 § 1 k.p.c.
Art. 73 § 2 k.p.c.
art. 351 § 1 k.p.c
art. 231 k.p
art. 65 § 1 k.c
art. 3921 pkt 2 k.p.c

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text