Legislator Case Law & Legislation
II UK 264/03 AI generated

Supreme Court denies family pension to widow whose religious marriage lacked prior court-ordered alimony rights.

Case Number II UK 264/03
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court dismissed the cassation appeal filed by Teresa M. against the Social Insurance Institution's refusal of a family pension. The applicant, a lawyer, argued that her 1996 Catholic marriage to a war-disabled veteran should be recognized as a 'concubinage' marriage, granting her pension rights despite the lack of a prior divorce decree with alimony. The court rejected this, ruling that the applicant is legally treated as a widow because she failed to meet the statutory conditions for a family pension under the relevant social insurance laws.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 24 ust. 2 pkt 1 a i b w związku z art. 64 ustawy o z.i.w.; The Supreme Court established that a person without a court-ordered alimony right from a prior divorce, who remarried exclusively in a canonical form between 1958 and 1998, is not entitled to a family pension after the death of the ex-spouse.

Keywords

AI generated
family pension eligibility canonical marriage recognition social insurance law alimony rights absence discrimination claim rejection religious marriage status Supreme Court ruling

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 24 ust. 2 pkt 1 a i b w związku z art. 64 ustawy o z.i.w.
art. 70 ust. 3 ustawy z dnia 17 grudnia 1998 r. o emeryturach i rentach z Funduszu Ubezpieczeń Społecznych
art. 1 § 2 Kodeksu rodzinnego
art. 67 Konstytucji
art. 8 ust. 1 Konwencji
art. 14 Konwencji
art. 3932 § 2 k.p.c
art. 3931 pkt 1 k.p.c
art. 39312 k.p

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text