I PK 590/02
AI generated
Employee name disclosure by employer is not wrongful unless it violates other personal rights like privacy or reputation.
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe Supreme Court dismissed the plaintiff's cassation appeal regarding the wrongful disclosure of his name in a newspaper advertisement. The plaintiff argued that publishing his name without consent violated his personal rights and caused moral and material harm. The court ruled that such disclosure is not wrongful if justified by the employer's duties and necessary for business operations without infringing on other protected interests.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedArt. 23 ust. 1 k.c.; Art. 24 k.c.; Art. 111 k.p.: The disclosure of an employee's name by an employer without consent does not constitute a wrongful infringement of personal rights if justified by employer duties and necessary for business conduct.
Keywords
AI generated
employee name disclosure
personal rights infringement
employer duties
cassation appeal dismissal
business necessity
personal data protection
labor law dispute
Cited Legislation
AI generatedArt. 23 ust. 1 k.c.
Art. 24 k.c.
Art. 111 k.p.
Art. 32 Konstytucji RP
Art. 14 ust. 1 ustawy z 16 kwietnia 1993 r. o zwalczaniu nieuczciwej konkurencji
Art. 393 § 12 k.p.c.
art. 23 k.c
art. 24 k.c
art. 111 k.p
art. 300 k.p