Legislator Case Law & Legislation
I PK 456/02 AI generated

Supreme Court quashes labor dispute verdict regarding municipal health task transfer and employer identity. The court found the employer was the municipality, not the health facility. The case is remanded for retrial to determine the correct employer. The court ruled that the municipality, not the health facility, was the employer because the tasks were not transferred to the facility. The court held that the municipality, not the health facility, was the employer because the tasks were not transferred to the facility. The court held that the municipality, not the health facility, was the employer because the tasks were not transferred to the facility.

Case Number I PK 456/02
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Decision Date
Outcome Partially Allowed

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court quashed the lower court's verdict regarding the employer identity in a labor dispute between a nurse and a health facility. The plaintiff sought to establish an employment relationship with the health facility, while the defendant argued the municipality was the employer. The court determined that the municipality had not transferred the specific tasks to the health facility, making the municipality the employer under labor law. Consequently, the verdict was partially overturned, and the case was remanded for a new trial to clarify the employer status.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 231 § 1 k.p.; Art. 231 § 2 k.p.; The transfer of municipal health tasks to a specific facility does not automatically make that facility the employer if the tasks were not formally assigned to it, requiring the municipality to be identified as the employer.

Keywords

AI generated
labor dispute employer identity municipal tasks health facility remand for retrial labor law public employment

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 231 § 1 k.p.
Art. 231 § 2 k.p.
Art. 382 k.p.c.
Art. 393 § 1 k.p.c.
art. 231 § 1 k.p
art. 231 k.p
art. 41 k.p
art. 411 § 1 k.p
art. 382 k.p.c
art. 477 k.p.c

Cited Case Law

AI generated
I PZP 10/93

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text