Legislator Case Law & Legislation
III PZP 4/03 AI generated

Supreme Court ruled collective agreement severance pay is distinct from statutory severance under PKP privatization law.

Case Number III PZP 4/03
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Decision Date
Outcome Allowed / Granted

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court resolved a legal question regarding whether collective agreement severance pay is absorbed by statutory severance under the PKP privatization law. The plaintiff argued that the statutory exclusion clause prevented receiving both payments, while the court emphasized the strict mandatory nature of the statutory provision. Consequently, the court held that the collective agreement severance constitutes a separate benefit not excluded by the law.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 50 ust. 3 ustawy z dnia 8 września 2000 r. o komercjalizacji, restrukturyzacji i prywatyzacji przedsiębiorstwa państwowego „Polskie Koleje Państwowe"; Art. 9 Kodeksu Pracy: The statutory exclusion of severance pay does not absorb collective agreement severance pay, as the statutory norm is strictly mandatory and prevails over collective agreements.

Keywords

AI generated
collective agreement severance statutory severance pay mandatory legal norms PKP privatization law severance double payment

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 50 ust. 3 of the Act of 8 September 2000 on the commercialization, restructuring and privatization of the state-owned enterprise "Polskie Koleje Państwowe"
Art. 9 of the Labour Code

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text