Supreme Court dismisses appeal on expert report admissibility and successor company standing issues.

The Supreme Court dismissed the cassation appeal filed by the appellant against the lower court's judgment. The appellant argued that the expert opinions should be treated as expert witness reports rather than private documents and questioned the defendant's standing as a successor to a liquidated state enterprise. The court ruled that the expert reports were correctly classified as private documents under the Civil Procedure Code and that the issue of legal succession is a matter of substantive law, not procedural standing.