Supreme Court dismisses cassation when multiple experts confirm full capacity for farm work, making disability claim invalid.
Poland (PL)
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe Supreme Court dismissed the cassation appeal filed by Zygmunt W. against the Second Instance Court's refusal of his farm disability pension. The applicant argued that the lower court violated procedural and substantive laws regarding his inability to work, despite medical opinions from seventeen experts confirming his full capacity. The court ruled that the consistent expert findings established a factual basis for denying the pension, rendering the cassation grounds baseless.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedArt. 21 ust. 1 i 2 ustawy z dnia 20 grudnia 1990 r. o ubezpieczeniu społecznym rolników; Art. 233 § 1 k.p.c.: Where multiple expert opinions unanimously establish the claimant's full capacity for farm work, a disability pension claim is invalid, and the second instance court's assessment of evidence does not violate procedural or substantive law.