II UKN 446/99
AI generated
Special work conditions proof does not require expert opinion knowledge under Polish social security law.
Poland (PL)
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe Supreme Court dismissed the cassation appeal regarding the applicant's right to early retirement based on special work conditions. The applicant argued that determining if work was performed under special conditions required expert testimony due to legal ambiguity, but the court found no such complexity. The court ruled that establishing the duration and continuity of work does not necessitate specialized knowledge or expert evidence under the relevant regulation.
Legislator headnote
AI generated§ 2 ust. 1 rozporządzenia Rady Ministrów z dnia 7 lutego 1983 r.; Determining whether work was performed under special conditions or special character does not require specialized knowledge justifying expert opinion evidence.
Keywords
AI generated
special work conditions
expert opinion evidence
specialized knowledge requirement
early retirement entitlement
social security regulation
cassation appeal dismissal
work duration assessment
Cited Legislation
AI generated§ 2 ust. 1 rozporządzenia Rady Ministrów z dnia 7 lutego 1983 r. w sprawie wieku emerytalnego dla pracowników zatrudnionych w szczególnych warunkach lub szczególnym charakterze
art. 278 § 1 KPC
art. 382 KPC
art. 393 § 12 KPC
Cited Case Law
AI generateduchwała SN z dnia 27 maja 1986 r., III UZP 5/85