Legislator Case Law & Legislation
II UKN 399/99 AI generated

Supreme Court dismisses request for third expert opinion when first expert rigidifies stance due to doubts.

Case Number II UKN 399/99
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court of Poland dismissed the cassation appeal regarding a disability pension claim, sending the case back for retrial. The lower court had ordered a third expert opinion from the same specialist after the applicant criticized the initial medical assessment. The Supreme Court ruled that seeking another opinion from the same expert is irrational if the expert merely rigidifies their previous stance rather than expanding their analysis.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 286 in fine KPC; Art. 393 § 1 KPC: When an expert's additional opinion indicates they are rigidifying their previous stance due to doubts rather than expanding their analysis, the court is obligated to seek an opinion from a different expert.

Keywords

AI generated
third expert opinion medical expert rigidification disability pension claim freedom of evidence assessment irrationality of additional opinion KPC procedural law medical expert competence

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 286 in fine KPC
Art. 393 § 1 KPC

Cited Case Law

AI generated
II URN 12/94 OSNAPiUS 1994 nr 4, poz. 71

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text